资源描述
清感汤治疗流行性感冒高热 121 例临床观察
作者:戈兴中 高爱民 张金阁
【摘要】目的 观察清感汤对流行性感冒高热的治疗作用及对肝、
肾功能的影响。方法 将 121 例流行性感冒高热患者随机分为治疗组
60 例与对照组 61 例,治疗组予清感汤,每日 2 剂,水煎服;对照组
予金刚烷胺 100 mg,每日 2 次口服。观察 2 组用药后临床疗效、退热
时间、用药前后血丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT) 、尿素氮(BUN)的变化及
不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗组治愈 51 例(85%) ,对照组治愈 24
例(39%) 2 组治愈率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05) 2 组退热
, ;
时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05) 2 组治疗前后 ALT、BUN 变 ;
化比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05) 2 组治疗后均无不良反应发生。 ;
结论:清感汤治疗流行性感冒高热疗效确切。
【关键词】 清感汤;流行性感冒;高热;祛湿除热
【Abstract】 Objective To observe the therapeutic effect
of Qinggan Decoction on influenza and its effect on patients'
liver and kidney function. Methods 121 patients with influenza
were randomly divided into two groups. 60 patients in treatment
group were treated by Qinggan decoction, twice a day, decocted
in water for oral dose, while the other 61 patients in control
1
group were treated by amantadine,100 mg once, twice a day. After
treatment the therapeutic effect, the defervescent time, and the
changes of ALT,BUN before and after treatment and adverse
reactions were observed for both groups. Results The 51 patients
(85%) in treatment group were cured, while 24 patients(39%) in
control group were cured, there was a significant difference
between the two groups(P<0.05); there was a significant
difference in defervescent time between two groups(P<0.05);
there were no significant differences in the changes of ALT, BUN
before and after treatment between two groups(P>0.05);there
was no adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Qinggan
decoction has a definite therapeutic effect on high fever caused
by influenza.
【Key words】 Qinggan decoction; Influenza; High fever;
Expelling dampness to remove fever
流行性感冒 (以下简称流感) 目前国内外研究重点多在预防方面,
而临床中有不少流感患者需要治疗,且流感高热期传染性最强,不能
迅速退热治愈,不仅增加病毒传播机会,还可引起很多并发症[1] 。
2006-01-01—2007-04-10,我们以清感汤治疗散发流感高热患者 60
例,并与金刚烷胺治疗 61 例对照观察,现报告如下。
2
1 资料与方法
1.1 诊断及排除标准
符合中华人民共和国国家标准"流行性感冒诊断标准及处理
原则"中流感样病例标准[2] ,并且甲型流行性感冒病毒抗原检测胶
体金法(+);同时符合中医时行感冒标准,即有恶寒发热、头痛身痛或
腰背酸痛、有汗或无汗、脉浮、舌苔薄白等全身症状,又有咳嗽、流
涕、鼻塞、咽痛、声重声哑、纳差、恶心等局部性症状。除外年龄<
40 岁及>65 岁者;体温低于 38.5℃者;已有肺炎等合并症者;合并
有心、脑、肾、肝、造血系统疾病者。
1.2 一般资料
全部病例均为本院内科门诊患者,随机分为 2 组。治疗组 60
例,男 40 例,女 20 例;年龄 41~65 岁,中位数 54 岁;病程 1~3
日,平均 1.4 日;体温 38.5℃~39.4℃ 35 例,39.5℃以上 25 例。对
照组 61 例,男 39 例,女 22 例;年龄 40~65 岁,中位数 54 岁;病程
1~3 日,平均 1.42 日;体温 38.5℃~39.4℃36 例,39.5℃以上 25
例。2 组一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05) 具有可比性。 ,
3
展开阅读全文