资源描述
新设课程申请表(专业课)
申请人姓名
王凌皞
职称
讲师
学 历
博士研究生
课程名称
Chinese Philosophy of Law
课程类别(请打钩)
博士生课
硕士生课
√
课程性质(请打钩)
专业学位课
√
专业选修课
涉及专业
培养方案
调整情况
专业一: LL.M. in Chinese Law
年
级
所有年级
硕士
√
博士
直博生
专业二:
硕士
博士
直博生
专业三:
硕士
博士
直博生
专业四:
硕士
博士
直博生
申
请
理
由
增进学生对中国古典法律思想的理解,了解中国传统法律文化,让学生了解中国古典法律思想对当下热切讨论的法理学议题有怎样启示和贡献。
学科(专业)意 见
学科(专业)负责人签名: 日期:
学
院
意
见
主管院长签名( 盖 章): 日期:
研究生培养处制
浙江大学研究生课程教学大纲
一、基本情况
课程编号
开课(院)系
法学院
开课学期
秋冬学期
中文课程名称
中国法哲学
授课语言
英语
英文课程名称
Chinese Philosophy of Law
任课教师1
王凌皞
职称
讲师
工作证号
E-mail:
wanglinghao@
联系电话
13656656868
课内总学时数及其分配(1学分16学时)
32
自学
讲课
Ö
讨论
Ö
实验
其他
学分数
2
考核方式
期末论文
二、课程内容中文简介(不少于300字)
本课程是一门研究生的高阶讨论课,主要关注以儒家为代表的中国古典法律思想。借助当代法理学上的分析方法和工具,课程将在精读古典文献的基础上,以不同的基础性主题作为分类来重新阐释古典法律思想。例如:法律是什么?法律的功能是什么?法律与道德有怎样的联系?政治权威的正当性在哪里?我们将借助古典思想家提出的看法,来结合当代的法理学、政治哲学课题,进一步深化对上述这些问题的看法。本课程的最终目标在于训练学生的批判性阅读能力,把握法理学中基本主题,并最终对中国古典法律文化有充分的理解。
三、课程内容外文简介
This is an advanced-level seminar on Chinese Philosophy of Law, focused especially on the great Confucian thinkers in classical times. We will investigate both positive theory and normative theory of law by reading and reinterpreting the crucial texts of ancient Chinese thinkers. We shall treat these ancient thinkers as our contemporaries who make fundamental claims about the most crucial questions in moral, political and legal philosophy at our time and reinterpret them in a sympathetic as well as critical way. To accomplish this goal, we will inevitably compare their claims and arguments with those of contemporary Western philosophers (in Anglo-American tradition generally). The style of the course will be analytical as well as comparative.
四、预备知识或先修课程要求
无
五、教学目的与要求(不少于200字)
教学目的:
1、培养学生对中国古代思想文本的文本细读和批判性阅读的能力;
2、让学生熟悉并能够运用当代法理学的分析方法来处理古代法律思想;
3、有能力重构古典思想家的论证思路,并在此基础上做进一步的批判性处理。
最终目标是目标在于训练学生的批判性阅读能力,把握法理学中基本主题,并最终对中国古典法律文化有充分的理解。
教学要求:
1、提前阅读一二手文献并积极参与课堂讨论;
2、对中国古典文献中的法律思想有足够知识上的把握;
3、能够运用上述知识来分析当代的问题。
六、教材或
讲义
讲义:Chinese Jurisprudence by Wejen Chang
七、参考书目
Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
Graham, A. C. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1989.
Munro, Donald J. The Concept of Man In Early China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1969.
Schwartz, Benjamin I. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.
八、教学日历(授课内容详细至二级标题,实验课、讨论课写出题目或主题)
周次
教学内容(包括课堂讲授、实验、讨论、考试等)
备注
1
A Methodological Introduction
The historical/classical approach and philosophical approach to ancient thinkers are fundamentally differente. The philosophical approach takes the validity of the claims and the soundness of the arguments as the most central questions we need to evaluative when we read classical texts. A tool set of critical reading will also be introduced that might include the Principle of Charity (of Donald Davidson) and the distinction of Concept and Conception (of Ronald Dworkin).
2
Confucian Virtue Ethics
Confucian moral philosophy is a version of virtue ethics. It has two crucial virtues that are Ren (humanity) and Yi (righteousness). The basic content of the concept of Ren and Yi and its relationship to Li (social norms) will be discussed. It show us the general positions Confucian thinkers take in these fundamental debates in moral philosophy between, for example, emotion v.s. reason and character v.s. rule.
3
Mencian Theory of Human Nature and its Normative Implication
Mecncius' theory of human nature represents a Naturalistic moral theory that see ethics as the continuance of the biology. In its legal form, it claims that the state should take perfection of citizens as its goal and facilitate moral development with the support of legal framework. The state should protect its citizen from bad moral luck by legal means and help them to preserve their fragile condition of moral development and practice.
4
Moral Conflicts and the Role of Law
The tolerating and concealing between kinfolks is a representative character of Ancient Chinese legal system. Mencius also discussed this topic in three famous cases. This legal arrangement shows what law could do to handle the complex moral dilemmas or conflicts. It shows that law could do more than just serves as authoritative and second-order verdicts for practical reasoning as Raz claims.
5
Correcting Names and Thick Legal Concepts
A philosophical inquiry into the nature of Confucian theory of Name will be made and Name will be interpreted as a kind of thick evaluative concept (Bernard Williams). Based on the reading that Zhengming is a doctrine concerning the guidance function of legal rules, a critique will be advanced towards some of the doctrinal theorist’s mechanical method with regard to applying legal concepts.
6
Dong Zhongshu's Particularist Theory of Rule Application
Drawing insights from Jonathan Dancy's moral particularism and Dong Zhongshu’s method of “adjudication according to the moral classics,” we will discuss a holistic balancing theory of legal reasons. With this in place, two dogmas of legal formalism will be criticised.
7
Virtue Theory of Adjudication
Two general approaches in legal epistemology, virtue reliablism and procedural reliablism will be introduced.These two positions, though seemingly incompatible, are mutually supportive and could be reconciled with each other. After a comparison between two conceptions of justice behind the ideas of “rule of man” and “rule of law,” the Confucian account of Li and Yi sheds lights on our understanding of the virtue of justice and provides a way to justify the centrality of judicial virtues in legal adjudication. In this account, the virtue of justice as lawfulness, owned or should be owned by judges, justifies legal decisions. According to this aretaic notion of justice, a correct or justified decision in legal adjudication is a decision made by a virtuous judge or would be characteristically made by a virtuous judge.
8
A Confucian Theory of Constitution?
Zhang Qianfan provides a Confucian account of basic constitutional rights and a Confucian theory of human dignity. We will critically analyses his account and compare it with constitutional theories of Jeremy Waldron.
5
展开阅读全文