传媒及传媒人素养之我见——小悦悦事件.doc

传媒和传媒人的素养之我见——小悦悦事件

一、 对小悦悦事件的看法
在佛山发生了小悦悦事件，事件的发生除了令人愤慨之外，由于媒体曝光后善心人士的捐助，也令人唏嘘。如果说2008年的四川大地震令世人看到中国人美好人性的一面，现在的小悦悦事件，却让世人看到中国人人性丑陋的一面。
看过小悦悦被车碾的视频后，我真的非常的气氛，如果说第一次碾过是由于意外导致的，但是接着再碾第二下这又是怎么一回事呢？只能说这司机太冷血了，应该受到道德的眼里谴责和法律的严惩。假想第一次碾过之后能够及时的拨打急救电话，又或者路人发现情况后能够及时的送往医院，我想小悦悦的情况比现在肯定要好。
对于这件事情我本来是非常失望的，其中包括司机的冷血和前18位路人的无情，但现在我却心里感到了一丝的安慰了，自从小悦悦的时间被报道之后，很多好心人都赶来医院看望她以及她的家人，给他们送去了祝福和资金，从这看来好心人还是很多的。对于这次事件，我有以下几点看法：
第一，加强对公民的道德素质教育。尊老爱幼和助人为乐都是中华民族的传统美德，我们应该在全社会范围内继续弘扬这种好的传统，给未来的一代做好榜样。社会上以前是出现过一些有损感情的事情，如钓鱼执法、搀扶老人反被告的一些现象，但我们不能因噎废食，如果大家都这么想，那以后将是一个什么样的社会。
第二、加强普法意识宣传。当前中国在建设法治国家上投入了巨大精力，但还得继续努力，加强普法的力度与广度，尤其是要加大在基层的普法力度，让广大底层人民也能够学法，懂法和用法，假设那位撞人的司机具有一定的法律意识，那么他就应该不会逃逸，而是想办法如何救人，承担起该负的责任。
第三，加强制度的完善。当记者采访者为撞人的司机时，司机说了这样的一席话：“假如这个小孩没被撞死的话，有可能在治疗上回花掉自己几十万，而撞死了几万就可以了。”从这我们可以看出，当前中国的制度设计确实存在一些问题，相关部门应该找出制度的漏洞，提高违法犯罪的成本，我想他们就不会有这种愚蠢的想法了。
如今，只望肇事司机得到应有的惩罚，希望类似小悦悦事件不再发生。

二、相关事件的报道
这件事，影响之广，不仅仅在佛山、在广东、在全国，还传到了海外华人那里，更甚至，美国、日本、韩国也有很多媒体分析报道这件事。 一下是几篇相关事件报道：

【1】美国报道

Bystanders’ Neglect of Injured Toddler Sets Off Soul-Searching on Web Sites in China

2011年10月18日 来源：The New York Times 作者： MICHAEL WINES

BEIJING — Last Thursday, a van navigating the narrow streets of a hardware market in Foshan, in the southern province of Guangdong, struck and ran over a 2-year-old girl. The driver paused, then drove away. A surveillance camera showed that the toddler lay grievously injured for seven minutes, ignored by at least 18 passers-by, while a second vehicle ran over the child and drove on. A 57-year-old rag collector finally went to her aid.
The next day an apparently suicidal woman jumped into a lake in Hangzhou, a city southwest of Shanghai, and began flailing helplessly. A woman widely reported to be an American threw off her coat, swam the 65 feet to the drowning woman and expertly hauled her to shore. And then, seeing she was safe, the rescuer left without giving her name.
Neither episode is necessarily representative: many Chinese do help those in dire straits, and, obviously, Americans do not always come to the rescue. But thousands of microbloggers in China have used the juxtaposition of callousness and heroism to fuel a wrenching debate over whether people in their country lack compassion and, if so, why.
It is the sort of national conversation, increasingly common now, that did not exist before in a land where the printed press and broadcast media largely remain controlled by a Communist Party more interested in directing public opinion than in reflecting on the national mood. “What kind of nation is this?” asked one microblogger who called himself Patton Yu. “It doesn’t matter if an individual’s nature is good or bad, it’s the system that has made us deteriorate.”
Said one commentator about the Hangzhou rescue: “Yesterday Obama had a beer with out-of-work construction workers. Today, I see a story about an American tourist jumping into the water to save someone. I finally realized why America is such a strong country and will continue to be one.”
By Tuesday, more than 9.3 million people had posted comments on the toddler’s accident on Sina’s Weibo, the leading microblog, or Tencent Holdings’ QQ service. Chinese reports on Monday quoted doctors as saying that if the child survived, she was likely to remain in a vegetative state for the remainder of her life. Far fewer commented on the Hangzhou rescue — in the scores of thousands — but those who did raised the same ethical concerns about going — or not going — to the aid of a fellow Chinese.
In an unscientific online survey conducted by the Web site — an arm of the independent Hong Kong-based Phoenix Television — some 170,000 respondents, who voted on their own initiative, judged by a wide margin that the toddler’s case was proof that the Chinese people’s morals and mutual trust were eroding under the pressures of modern society.
Yet the question of compassion in Chinese society is not a new one. In 1894, an American missionary, Arthur H. Smith, wrote an influential book, “Chinese Characteristics,” in which a chapter, “The Absence of Sympathy,” raised similar questions.
“Unwillingness to give help to others, unless there is some special reason for doing so, is a trait that runs through Chinese social relations in multifold manifestations,” he wrote.
Mr. Smith offered only anecdotes to back his beliefs. But some current observers in China say his views carry an element of truth, albeit for different reasons.
More than a few blame the state of Chinese law, which they contend is too subject to judges’ whims and hidden influences, for making people afraid to help their neighbors.
Most cite the widely publicized case of Peng Yu, a Nanjing resident who in 2006 stopped to help a 65-year-old woman who had fallen, only to be accused by the woman of causing her fall. A court ruled for the woman, using the logic that Mr. Peng would never have assisted her had he not been responsible for the fall in the first place. The decision angered many Chinese, but it also may have made them more reluctant to act in others’ behalf.
Unlike some Western nations, China has no “good Samaritan” laws that protect people who render emergency aid from prosecution.
Some also cite what they say is a skewed legal code that actively discourages good Samaritans. News accounts of the Foshan case quoted one driver who hit the toddler as saying, “If she is dead, I may pay only about 20,000 yuan,” or about $2,135. “But if she is injured, it may cost me hundreds of thousands of yuan.”
While the account could not be independently verified, tapes of the driver’s phone call to a journalist are widespread on the Web. (Chinese news reports say that the drivers of both vehicles that struck the child have been arrested, but offered no details.)
Dai Qing, a Beijing journalist and social activist, said the cases of the toddler and the near drowning raised two issues: “The first one is that China’s law has proved again and again that it cannot protect justice. The second issue is a vacuum of beliefs.”
She added: “All the traditional values of Chinese society were thrown out the window to make way for Mao and the rest of the party leadership. But that died long ago, and there was nothing to replace it except a materialistic hunger.”
In truth, everyone has empathy for his fellow citizens, said Lynn Hunt, a U.C.L.A. historian whose 2007 book, “Inventing Human Rights: A History,” charts the West’s development of the concept. But whereas a Westerner might stress an individual’s ability to change the world with one good deed, the Chinese worldview might center more on the duty to protect family members and close friends.
Pu Zhiqiang, a Beijing lawyer frequently involved in civil rights cases, recited the tale of a neighbor who recently fell on a concrete floor and whose pleas for help were ignored by bystanders.
“The law is supposed to be the bottom line of a society,” he said. “Anything above that line is not about the law. Above the bottom line, China does not have any guideline for social behavior. There is no religion or faith. There are no role models.”
That is one theory. But many Chinese clearly do care: just as Americans were stirred to national outrage in 1964 after news reports (since disputed) said that dozens of New Yorkers ignored the cries of a young woman, Kitty Genovese, who was being stabbed to death, Chinese microblogs are filled with outrage over the toddler’s fate.
“We do not want to be Chinese bystanders,” wrote one commentator who called himself Zuoyunwangyadong. “Who you are makes who China is; how you are makes how China is. If you are bright, then China is not in the dark; but if you are indifferent, then China will be.”

【2】 韩国报道
교통사고 무관심 '개와 사람 비교' 화제
《交通事故冷漠“够比人”的话题》

2011年10月27日 来源：Pop News 作者： Min JongSik

최근 중국에서는 사람들의 무관심으로 인해 뺑소니 사고를 당한 두살배기 여자아이가 결국 사망에 이르는 충격적인 사고가 일어났다. CCTV를 통해 촬영된 사고 당시의 광경은 인터넷을 통해 공개되면서 충격과 공분을 유발하는 등 큰 파문을 낳았다.

교통사고에 무관심한 사람, 그리고 사람과는 전혀 다른 행동을 보이는 개를 비교한 '개 vs 사람 비교 사진'이 해외 네티즌 사이에서 큰 화제다.

큰 부상을 입고 길가에 쓰러진 소녀를 본 사람들은 보고도 못 본 척 자기 갈 길을 가느라 바쁘다. 하지만 개는 사람과는 전혀 다른 행동을 보인다. 얼룩무늬 개 한 바리는 사고의 충격으로 누워있는 누렁이 동료를 방치하지 않는다. 이 개는 동료를 안전한 곳으로 옮긴 후 정성껏 돌보는 자세를 취하는 것.

다친 어린아이의 곁을 그냥 지나치는 18명의 사람들, 다친 개를 열심히 간호하는 말도 못하는 짐승. 별다른 설명도 없이 '사진'으로 모든 것을 설명하는 이 비교 사진은 최근 해외 인터넷을 통해 소개되면서 사람들의 고개를 푹 숙이게 만들고 있다.

무관심이 낳은 도덕성 불감증
《无关心产生道德麻木症 》

2011年10月25日 来源：NEWSCJ

최근 중국에서 두 살배기 여자 아기가 길에서 두 번이나 차에 치이는 동안 아무도 도와주지 않아 숨진 사건이 큰 파문을 일으키고 있다. 워낙에 큰 땅덩어리를 가진 나라에 인구도 많은지라 사람 들고 나는 일에 무감각할 수도 있겠지만 위험에 처한 사람을 보고도 나 몰라라 하는 중국인들이 많아 중국 내에서도 문제가 되고 있다고 한다.

어린아이가 차에 두 번이나 치여도 나 몰라라 한 중국인들 이야기로 충격을 안긴 지 얼마 되지 않는 상황에서 어려움에 빠진 사람을 보고도 무관심한 중국인들의 모습을 보여주는 또 다른 사례가 공개됐다.

최근 남방도시보(南方都市報) 보도에 따르면 지난 8일 오후 4시께 아들을 데리러 가던 한 여성이 중국 광둥(廣東)성 둥관(東莞)의 거리에서 괴한의 공격을 받았다. 괴한이 이 여성을 흉기로 위협해 반지와 휴대전화, 지갑 등을 빼앗고 성폭행하는 30여 분 동안 여성이 소리를 지르며 도움을 요청했지만 아무도 도움을 주지 않았다.

여성은 괴한이 떠난 이후에도 30분간 거의 알몸 상태로 현장에 있었지만 인근을 지나던 수십 대의 오토바이 운전자 중 아무도 도움을 주지 않았다고 한다. 온몸이 묶인 상태였던 이 여성은 결국 사건 발생 두 시간이 지난 뒤 스스로 몸을 굴려 도로 한가운데로 빠져나온 뒤에야 지나가던 남성의 도움을 받을 수 있었다고 한다. 자칫 귀중한 한 생명을 앗아갈 수도 있었던 이 사건은 여성을 도운 남성이 언론에 제보하면서 알려졌다. 비단 이 사건들만이 아닐 것이다. 언론에 공개되지 않았을 뿐 어려움에 처한 사람을 보고도 무심히 지나치는 경우는 비일비재할 것이다.

허나 중요한 것은 중국인들의 도덕성 불감증에 대한 일련의 사건을 접하면서 그들의 무관심을 비난만 해서는 안 된다는 것이다. 우리 또한 그런 모습이 없는지 돌아봐야 한다. 내 일, 내 것이 아니기에 방관하고 있는 것 또한 도덕성 불감증의 한 모습이기 때문이다. 혼자서 상대하기 벅찬 위험을 목격했다면 그냥 지나치는 것보다는 주위에 도움을 청하고 경찰에 신고하는 것이 큰 도움이 되리라는 것은 누구나 잘 아는 사실이다. 내 이웃에 누가 사는지도 모르고 무슨 어려움에 처했는지도 모르는 것, 속속들이 알아야 할 필요까지는 없더라도 위험에 처했을 때 도움을 줄 수 있을 정도의 관심은 가져야 하지 않을까 한다.

【3】中国报道
“小悦悦事件”的法律思考
2011年11月03日 来源：《光明日报》 责任编辑： 章丽鋆
最近，广东“小悦悦事件”在社会上引发了强烈反响。大家一方面谴责18位冷漠路人，另一方面也都在反思和探讨，以寻求解决摔倒不扶问题的出路。有人说必须立法惩治见死不救者，有人说必须对见义勇为进行奖励，还有人说要向因做好事而遭讹者提供帮助。这样能解决摔倒不扶的社会问题吗？
    见死不救入罪可能事与愿违
    “小悦悦事件”后，冷漠路人受到严厉谴责。有律师和学者提出必须严厉惩治见死不救者，这样不仅可以使社会的救助需求得到满足，还可以提升民众的道德水准。我以为，道德的法律化必须有其限度，超过限度的法律不是无效，就是无理。鉴于中国目前的社会情势和民众道德水准，把见死不救行为规定为犯罪，未必能够促使民众去救助困境中的人。
    在中国目前的社会情势下，这种制度的实施不仅不能使更多的人得到救助，反而会使更多的人因不能得到救助而加重伤害或死亡。这是因为，在没有把见死不救规定为犯罪之前，虽然也常遗憾地出现民众围观而不予救助的冷漠情景，但国人的围观也具有极强的信号功能。很多情况下，一些道德高尚者，如军人、学生等，在较多情形下，正是凭借这种信号发现处于困境中的人并进行施救。而若把见死不救规定为犯罪，民众必然会有其对策行为。因害怕一不小心涉及犯罪，大家对需要救助的对象，如摔倒的老人、落水的人，连看都不敢再看一眼，最后连围观的都没有，需要救助的人因此不能经由围观信号而被道德高尚者及时发现，从而导致更多的人因得不到救助而死亡。
    另一方面，这种制度使人人自危，从而不仅不能提升民众的道德水准，反而使民众之间变得更加疏远。这种冷漠才是真正的人间悲剧。再从执法机关的角度看，确定见死不救者并追究其责任需要信息支持，执法机关面临着发现见死不救者的信息障碍，从而会使该制度形同虚设。
    对做好事反被讹者提供法律援助有难度
    面对问题，还有人说要对因做好事而遭讹者予以帮助。日前，国内有律师针对连续发生的救人反被诬陷的案例，倡议成立“停止冷漠律师团联盟”，如果有人主动救人遭遇讹诈，律师团将免费提供法律援助。这自然是好事，对被诬陷者而言，有帮助总比没帮助好。但问题在于，这种帮助所能起到的作用会有多大？国内救人反被诬陷的案件之所以很难判决，不是法律适用上的疑难，而根源在于事实问题。这种瞬间发生的事，如果没有摄像头的记录，没有目击证人，事实就很难再搞清楚，律师对这种瞬间发生的事情在事实问题上所能起的作用极小。相反，在事实不能再搞清楚的情形下，律师的这种援助可能还会惠及真正的致害人。因此，从案件的性质看，法律援助在这类案件中所能起的作用不会有想象中那么大。
    法律必须对诬陷者作出反应
    面对摔倒不扶体现出的社会冷漠我们究竟该怎么办？对冷漠路人的谴责、处罚以及对扶助者的奖励、帮助能较好地解决这一社会问题吗？我们首先应该问一问，究竟是谁制造了这种冷漠？解铃还得系铃人，从解决问题的角度看，法律必须对诬陷者和真正的撞人者作出应有的反应，否则我们现在说的“拒绝冷漠，传递温暖”仅仅只会是一个口号而已。
    当然，这种反应的前提是社会要具有一定发现真相的能力。如何发现事实真相？有记者对近年来媒体报道的15起搀扶街头摔倒老人反被“诬陷”的事例进行分析发现，有6位当事人成功证明了自己的清白，其中2位是通过监控录像，4位是通过其他目击者的指证。
    40%的比例让我非常意外。随着更多摄像头的安装以及更多目击者的出现，更多的真相会被发现，诬陷不成功的比例会在50%以上。这类信息应该广为传播，让潜在的诬陷者知晓。当然，仅仅知晓是不够的，法律还必须对诬陷者作出反应。法律的反应也必须在“较多案件的真相会被发现”的大前提下，才会起到好的效果。这种反应包括对诬陷者进行行政处罚和让其承担刑事责任。这种惩罚是必要的，因为诬陷者的行为产生了极强的负外部性，对他人和社会造成了严重后果。可以相信，救人反被诬陷的情形在以后还会出现，为了有效解决问题，国内必须出现对诬陷者进行严厉处罚的案例。只需一例，其对潜在的诬陷者的抑制以及对民众的鼓舞作用不可估量。因此，执法机构应该积极执法，不能因为摔倒的老太太可怜或反悔道歉而放弃执法。须知，这种执法是当下解决摔倒不扶社会问题的最关键所在。“诬陷不成功的较高比例+诬陷不成功的法律后果+对诬陷者不利的案例”这种模式必然使潜在的诬陷者不敢铤而走险。
    要找出并依法严惩肇事者
    除了对诬陷者的处罚外，还应该通过具体的措施促使真正的撞人者主动履行扶起被撞者并送其至医院的义务。因为如果不是他的逃脱，也不至于形成如此之社会局面。法律对撞人者的反应可以包括设定严厉的民事责任、行政责任，以及考虑设定刑事责任。其中，民事责任上必须设定惩罚性赔偿制度，即撞人逃脱者须承担受害人医疗费用和其他损失的三至五倍。
    还有一类人，即主动把被撞者送到医院的撞人者，由于自己坚信不可能有证据证明是撞人者，而假称自己是做好事的人。这类人在现实中也会存在，只是由于瞬间发生的事情真相不能被发现，所以也没有进入大家的视野。虽然这类人把被撞者送到了医院，但其否认行为直接导致了社会民众的冷漠性反应，其负面影响更为显然。因此，他们应该比脱逃者承受更为严厉的法律责任。当然，与对前述的诬陷者的处罚类似，对撞人者的法律责任作为一种威胁的有效性，也决定于通过监控录像、目击者指证等方式而达致的一定比例的真相发现。而一定比例的真相发现在目前是可行的。（应飞虎 作者为深圳大学法学院教授）

“小悦悦”事件折射出人性冷漠之疼
2011年11月03日 来源：中国公路网　作者：陆建宝
“小悦悦”事件虽然过去二十几天了，但是自从看到这个事件时，内心就一直在伤疼不已。人性冷漠到禽兽不如，委实是和谐盛世下的一个莫大的悲哀。
　　据媒体报道，2011年10月13日下午5时30分，居住在广东佛山南海黄岐镇广佛五金城两岁的“小悦悦”像一块试金石，意外之中检验了人性到底在道德准则的天平上有多重。先后两辆机动车从小悦悦身上碾过后漠然逃逸，已经是人性之悲，更令人疼心的是十多名目击路人若无其事，亦或逃也似的不吭一声从“小悦悦”身边走过，实属可恶、可耻、可恨之极。大概近期又现身的“彭宇案”让一些人吓破了胆子，才昧了良心，采取了所谓明哲保身的“多一事不如少一事，事不关己高高挂起”的处世之道吧。
　　记得曾经有这么一个故事：冬日里，两只流浪猫四处流浪觅食玩耍，其中一只流浪猫在一次黑夜中横穿巷口时被一辆疾驰而过的汽车碾压断了后腿，只能瘫伏在冰冷的地面上，又冷又疼的流浪猫悲哀的呼号着，另一只流浪猫闻听后立马飞了过去，为受伤的同伴舔舐着滴血成冰的伤腿，并艰难而又执著地用嘴巴叼着同伴离开是非之地。它也许不知道一只动物在世间的冷暖，也许只知道见义勇为、扶贫积弱是任何生灵内心生发慈善的代名词。连猫狗尚且如此，作为灵长类高级动物的人呀，不该时刻反悔自己平日里的一举一动么？！
　　记得在观世音妙善成佛之前有句偈语：莫道世态炎凉，世上还是好人多。不管今后“小悦悦”的命运如何，应该感谢拾荒阿姨陈贤妹。在这个危急关头，这个矮小的贫民用实际行动真正诠释了什么叫良心。她的这一举动看似是平淡如菊，实则彰显了人性中伟大的光辉，那就是做人要对得起自己的良心。
　　毕竟，人的生命只有一次，任何生命都值得珍惜。那些漠视“小悦悦”生命安危的人哪，是否想到，今天你漠视了“小悦悦”，明天呢，后天呢，你能漠视了今天的“小悦悦”，在自己的亲人被别人漠视后，你是否能够承担这人性的冷漠之疼？！千万别让清贫成为慈善爱心的代名词。千万别让这世间的真情消失在弥足珍贵的人间大爱之中！

别忘记小悦悦事件的核心议程

2011年11月04日 来源：华商报 作者： 乾羽

在小悦悦去世以后，小悦悦的爸爸陷入了一种被质疑的处境：有人建议他赶快把收到的善款捐出去，有人甚至怀疑他在借机敛财。更多的人则向其伸出援手，希望他收到的善款可以解燃眉之急。舆论的善变让小悦悦的爸爸一时难以适从，原本让其感觉到温暖的善款，现在成为了烫手的山芋。（11月3日人民网）
在小悦
悦事件的最新舆论动向中，出现善款使用被质疑的声音并不奇怪。善款使用情况的确是一个可以讨论的话题，善款的使用情况直接决定着慈善能够走多远。也正是因为这个原因，媒体才关注了这个舆论动向，似乎质疑善款的使用情况正在成为一个重要的议程。
可是，可以质疑是否意味着现在质疑呢？如果，我们明白对一个事件的讨论可以有很多话题和议程，而这些话题和议程的迫切性是不同的，是有先后顺序的，就应该对这个问题仔细思量。在小悦悦事件中，最紧要的议程是什么？应该不是小悦悦的父亲如何支配善款，不是捐款该如何合理使用，当然也不应该是18个路人遭受了怎样的谴责。我们首先应该讨论的议程是：我们的道德怎么了？我们该怎样重建道德？这个问题虽然无比宏大，但是对此的思考却不能止步，也不能滞后，当小悦悦事件以如此惨烈的方式将此议程抛出时，社会必须反思，我们是否重视了这个必须正视的问题？
只有这个问题厘清了，这个问题讨论深入了，我们才能将注意力转移到小悦悦事件的其他议程上。因此，在面对一个复杂的小悦悦事件时，舆论既应该保持跟进的自觉，也应该明白自己的议程设置功能，搞清楚哪些议程是应该优先而且大力推进讨论的，而哪些议程虽然重要但是依然应该向后放放——— 放不等于回避，放是为了更好地讨论。

三、相关事件媒体及其报道存在的问题与不足。

小悦悦被车两次碾压事件的进展，我并不认同路人冷漠的观点。小悦悦被车碾压是突发事件，且肇事车辆逃逸，只留下受伤的小悦悦躺在马路上。路人在不明前因后果的情况下意外路过，注意或没注意到小悦悦都有可能，就算看到受伤的小悦悦也无从判断出事故原因，不施以援手或观察事态发展是正常反应。另外，事发后的监控显示，前后一共18人经过事发现场，且事发地点是在一市场或公共场所内，人流较多，导致“责任分散效应”产生，这是必然结果。
插说一句，责任分散效应说的是，在事发场所，如果有多人在场的情况下，帮助求助者的责任就由大家来分担，导致责任分散，旁观者甚至可能连自己的那一份责任都意识不到，从而产生一种“我不去救，自有人去救”的心理，形成“集体冷漠”的局面。这种集体冷漠并非是真正的人性冷漠。我相信就是这18个人，在没有集体氛围出现的情况下，目睹了小悦悦事件全过程，在第一时间伸出援手的可能性会远大于无动于衷、漠然路过。
　　 小悦悦事件中，并非所有人都无可指责。其中最该指责的是媒体从业者。这件事因受到媒体的关注而成新闻热点，小悦悦也在媒体的报道下成为公众关心的对象。但这些并不能掩盖媒体在这一新闻事件报道中的过错。过错一，误导公众。如果是一个负责任的媒体，应该通过新闻事件来质询事发场所交通的无序和市场管理人员又无作为；应该质询小悦悦的监护人的责任和探讨如何避免类似时间发生；最不该做的就是质问18路人的冷漠和针对冷漠做所谓的狗屁问卷调查。但，可能为了新闻噱头、为了报道出彩，把所有责难都打在了18路人身上，更有甚者像《广州日报》，竟然故意放大一种质询救人老奶奶涉嫌炒作的声音，这已经不是职业素养，而是记者素质的问题了。如此一来，肇事车主都可能获得公众的同情和谅解，18无关路人倒成了罪大恶极者。
11