按预定能力生産.docx

Run @ Rate GP-9
按预定能力生产

I. PURPOSE
目的
The purpose of a Run @ Rate is to verify:
Run @ Rate的目的是要核实：
A. the supplier's actual manufacturing process is capable of producing components that meet GM's on-going quality requirements, as stated in the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP), at quoted tooling capacity for a specified period of time; and
供应商的当前制造过程是否有能力在指定的一段时间内按声称的加工能力、生产出符合通用汽车公司现行质量要求的零部件。 如同在该零件“生产件批准” (PPAP) 文件中所述一 致。
B. the supplier's actual manufacturing process conforms to the manufacturing and quality plan documented by the supplier in PPAP, GP-12 and other required documentation
供应商的当前生产流程是否符合供应商在PPAP，GP-12或其它要求的文件中所记录的 制 造 和 质 量 计 划 。
During a Run @ Rate, all production tooling is to be in place and running at full capacity, utilizing all regular production, direct and indirect, personnel and support systems.
在Run @ Rate过程中，所有的生产工具应各就各位并且按最大能力运行，运用所有正 式 生产的 人 员 和支持系统，包括直接的和间接的。

II. SCOPE
适用范围
All new parts require a Run @ Rate, unless exempted by the supplier quality engineer and approved by the Supplier Quality and Purchasing Directors of the procuring division.
所有新的零部件都要通过Run @ Rate，除非供应商质量工程师认为可以免除并且得到 采 购 部 供 应 商质量和采购负责人的认可。

III. SELECTION PROCESS
规程选择
All new part numbers will be evaluated by GM, taking into consideration factors such as the following: history; new technology; irreversible tooling changes; and new supplier facilities. The need for the Run @ Rate will be confirmed by the Supplier Quality Engineer, and approved by the Supplier Quality and Purchasing Director(s) of the procuring division. The supplier will be notified of the need to perform a customer monitored or supplier monitored Run @ Rate as early in the Advanced Product Quality Planning Process as possible.
Note: See Section VIII for Additional Requirements for Supplier monitored Run @ Rate.
所有新零件号中的零件都要经过通用汽车公司的评审，将考虑到如下的一些因素：生产历史，新技术不能回复的模具更改，以及新的生产工厂等等。进行Run@Rate的必要性由供应商质量工程师确认，并且得到采购部门的供应商质量及采购负责人的认可。供应商将在前期产品质量计划(APQP)规程中尽早被通知是否要作一次用户监督或由供应商自行监督的Run @ Rate。
注：见第VIII节中有关于由供应商自行监督下的Run @ Rate R的附加要求。

IV. GENERAL INFORMATION
概述
A. DURATION OF RUN@RATE
Run @ Rate的周期
The number of components to be produced during the Run @ Rate should be sufficient to demonstrate manufacturing process capability and should be predetermined by the supplier and the procuring division's Supplier Quality Engineer(s). Factors such as product complexity, shelf life, storage, cost and single shift vs. multiple shift operations are taken into consideration in determining the length of the Run @ Rate. The default length of the Run @ Rate is one day of the customer's daily production requirement at full acceleration.
在Run@Rate过程中所生产的零部件的数量要足以表明其所具备的生产能力，并且由供应商和采购部门的质量工程师们共同预先商定。诸如产品复杂程度，有效期，贮存，费用，单班运作或多班轮 作等等，都是影响Run@Rate时间长短应考虑的因素。Run@Rate的默认周期是用户满负荷生产时一天的需求量。

B. TIMING OF RUN@RATE
Run @ Rate的开始时间
The Run @ Rate should be performed after the supplier has attained an acceptable PPAP submission and prior to start of production acceleration. Although encouraged to be performed as early as possible, a key consideration in establishing the Run @ Rate date is the stability of the design. The exact date should be predetermined by the procuring division and the supplier.
供应商必须在获得PPAP生产件批准后及在开始加速生产之前进行Run@Rate。尽管越早进行越好但是进行Run@Rate的关键考虑因素是该零件设计的确定性。确切的日期应由采购部门和供应商共同确定。
C. REQUIRED PARTICIPATION
要求参加的人员
1. Customer Monitored -
用户监督
Customer - A representative from the procuring division is to be present for the entire Run @ Rate. No portion of the Run @ Rate is to be performed without representation of the procuring division, without prior approval. The lead GM representative typically will be the Supplier Quality Engineer, with participation of the Buyer and/or Release Engineer upon request.
Supplier - The lead supplier representative is to be the project manager or manager appointee.
用户－－采购部门的一个代表到现场监督整个生产过程。没有预先的许可，没有代表到场，不得进行任何的操作，GM方面的首席代表是供应商质量工程师。如有需要，采购员和产品放行工程师也可能被邀参加。
供应商－－供应方的首席代表应是项目经理或是该项目经理指定的代表。
2. Supplier Monitored -
供应商 监 督
The lead supplier representative is to be the project manager or manager appointee.
供应方的首席代表应是项目经理或其指定的代表
Note: Equipment and/or subcontractors may be asked to participate.
注：设备制造商和分包商也可能被要求参加。
D. SUPPLIER PREPARTATION FOR RUN@RATE
供应商为Run @ Rate所作的准备
To make effective use of time, the supplier should conduct a practice Run @ Rate and/or production simulations, as well as complete as much of the Run @ Rate Worksheet (Attachment B), before the official Run @ Rate is conducted.
为了能有效地利用时间，在正式的Run@Rate进行之前，供应商应作一次演习或相应的模拟生产，并完成工作表 (附录B) 上所规定的尽可能多的项目和所有问答。
E. INVENTORYE.
存货
If parts are produced ahead of production schedules, the supplier will hold all parts produced until authorized to ship. The supplier will ensure that sufficient production containers and packaging are available to prevent part damage.
如果零件的制造发生在总装厂需要之前，供应商应保存全部的零件直到允许装运。供应商应保证有足够的生产用装运箱和合适的成品包装以防止零部件的损坏。

V. RUN@RATE REVIEW CONTENT
Run @ Rate检查内容

The Run @ Rate will verify that the results of the supplier's actual manufacturing process meet customer requirements for on-going quality, as stated in PPAP, and quoted tooling capacity. Also, it will verify that the supplier's actual process is to plan, as documented in PPAP, GP-12 and the other documentation listed below.

Run@Rate的目的是要核实供应商的实际制造过程是否符合现行质量要求(如在PPAP文件中所说的)以及报价所称的工装能力，并且供应商实际生产过程是否按照已订的计划，正如在PPAP、GP12及下列其它文件中所述的。

During the Run @ Rate, the following will be reviewed: documentation; the manufacturing process and results; part quality requirements and results; sub-supplier requirements and Run @ Rate results; and packaging.
在Run@Rate过程中，检查以下一些项目：文件，制造工艺和其结果，零件质量要求和其结果，对分供方的要求及其Run @ Rate 的 结 果，还有包装和搬运。

A. DOCUMENTATION : At the time of the Run@Rate , the following support documentation should be available for review:
文件 : 在作 Run @ Rate审核时，应出具下列证明性文件以备查阅。
1. PPAP package including :
PPAP 文件包括:
a) Process flow diagram 过程流程
b) Process control plan, with reaction plan 具有反应计划的过程控制计划
c) DFMEA / PFMEA 设计/过程失效模式及后果分析
d) Master part(s) 标样
2. GP-12( Pre-launch ) control plan
GP-12初期生产次品遏制的控制计划
3. Tool capacity information
工 装 能 力 情况
4. Operator/inspection instruction
操作 /检验指导书
5. Prototype / pilot concerns (PR/R’s)
样件/试生产时发生的问题(如PR/R)
6. Sub- contractor control / capacity data
分供方控制/能力数据
7. Sub-contractor material schedules and transportation
分供应商材料（含零件）生产计划及运输
8. Packaging / labeling plan
包装/ 标记计划
9. Acceleration plan
生产加速计划
Note : All documentation must be complete and correct
注: 所有文件都应完备及正确。

B. MANUFACTURING PROCESS – ACTUAL TO PLAN
制造过程– 实际相对于计划
1. The product is being manufactured at the production site using the production tooling, gaging, process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings.
产品应在生产现场用正式生产的工装、测量系统、工艺、材料、操作人员、环境和过程设定来进行生产。
2. The actual process flow agrees with the process flow diagram, as documented in PPAP.
实际生产流程应与PPAP 文件中的流程图相同。
3. Operator instructions/visual aids are available and adhered to at each work station.
应将操作指导书/目视参考图表置于相应的每个工作岗位。
4. All in-process documents, such as process control charts, are in place at the time of the Run @ Rate. The documentation is utilized to drive a defined reaction plan and corrective action process.
在进行Run@Rate时，所有过程文件都应在工位上，如过程控制计划。这些文件应用于实施规定的反应计划和纠正措施。
5. Production boundary samples, when required, are available at required work stations. 当需要时，在需要的工位上应拥有边际样品。

6. Maintenance plans are in place; repair and maintenance parts are available; and there is planned downtime for preventative maintenance.
应具备保养计划和用于维修和保养的备件以及进行预防性维修保养的停机计划。

Note: All of the preceding requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。

C. MANUFACTURING CAPACITY RESULTS
制造能力结果

The following will be verified while the process is running.
在进 行 生产时, 要核实以下内容：
1. Net output from each operation can support quoted capacity.
每 道 工 序的净产量与报价生产 能 力相符。
2. During the Run @ Rate, the tooling must meet the quoted up time requirements (net vs. gross quoted output). Any unexpected downtime must be documented and corrective action taken.
在按预定能 力生产时 ,工 装 应满 足报 价所 要求 的开机 时间要求(报价净产量和标称毛产量)。
记下任何意外的停工时间和要求的改进措施计划。
3. All line changeovers, if any, can be performed within the quoted tooling capacity requirements.
所有在线工装的更换应在报价工装能力要求范围内进行。
4. The net through-put of good pieces (scrap taken out, any allowable rework) meet daily quoted capacity.
合格零件的净产量(剔除废品, 保留返工合格零件)应与报价日生产能力相符。
5. The acceleration plan is sufficient to meet requirements.
加速生产计划足以满足客户要求。

Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有五项要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。

D. PART QUALITY PLAN TO ACTUAL
零件质量计划同实际相对比
1. All production checking fixtures must be complete, with acceptable measurement system studies (i.e., gage R and R) performed, and operator instructions/visual aids available.
所有生产检验设备应完备并且作了可接受的测量系统分析工作(即量具的重复性和再现性)。应具备操作指 导书/目视参考图表 。
2. All in process gaging and controls must be complete, functional and in place.
所有生产过程中的测量和控制设备应完备, 功能齐全并且到位。
3. The process control plan (normal and GP-12) must agree with the actual process. Production part checks and statistical monitoring must take place as outlined on the process control plan
过程控制计划 (一般的和GP12)应与现行过程相符，应按过程控制计划作零件检验和统计监测。
4. Potential failure modes, as identified in the PFMEA, are addressed through error-proofing or the control plan.
在PFMEA中所确定的潜在失效模式应有防错措施或控制计划来处置
5. The process control plan reaction plan as well as the supplier's corrective action process to ensure containment and correction should be available for review.
过 程 控 制 计 划 的 反 应 计 划 与 供 应 商 的 改 正 措 施 一 样 ， 确 保 在 检 查 时 有 遏 制 措 施 及 施 改 正 措 施 。

Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。

E. PART QUALITY RESULTS
零件质量结果
1. All parts produced off production tooling during the Run @ Rate meet GM's requirements for ongoing quality, as stated in PPAP.
在Run@Rate时,用生产工装生产出来的所有零件应符合PPAP中记载的GM对准予持续制造的质量要求。
2. The manufacturing process is in control.
制造过程必须受控。
3. The manufacturing process demonstrates the required capability.
制造过程应证明所要求的生产能力。
4. The process control plan is sufficient to effectively meet the design record requirements (i.e., control points, frequency of checks, etc.).
过程控制计划应能有效地满足设计要求,（即控制点, 检验频率等）。
5. Nonconformance
不符合性

Note: The total number of parts produced, the pieces rejected and the pieces reworked need to be documented on the summary sheet.
注：生产出来的零件总数，不合格零件数，返工合格零件数都应在GP-9总结表上纪录

a) The non-conformances yielded by the process were identified by the normal PPAP control plan. If identified by the GP-12 Process Control Plan or an activity outside documented plans, corrective action is required.
生产过程中的不符合项可由一般的PPAP控制计划识别出来。如果是由GP12过程控制计划或是由其他措施认别出来,则要求修改PPAP 控制计划。
b) The PFMEA identified the potential failure modes. If not, the PFMEA needs to be updated and corrective action put in place. 生产过程中的不符合项在PFMEA中应有预见，若未能做到，则PFMEA需要更新并且要采取改进措施。
c) All rework and repairs effectively correct the nonconformance(s).
返工及修复措施能有效地纠正不合格项。
d) All prototype and pilot concerns, if any, have been corrected and validated.
所有在工装样件及试生产件制造时发生的问题应已修正和验证。

Note: All of the preceding five requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注 ：上述所有要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。

F. SUBCONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS
分供方要求
1. Subcontractor(s)' abilities to meet the customer's quality and capacity requirements must be confirmed by the supplier prior to the Run @ Rate being conducted at the supplier's facility. Verification of the subcontractor(s)' manufacturing processes should be accomplished through a Run @ Rate or similar process conducted by the supplier.
在进行Run@Rate以前，供应商应该对分供方是否能满足用户的质量和数量要求进行确认。上述核实应由供应商采用Run @ Rate规程或相似的过程加以实施。
2. Controls must be in place to isolate incoming material until it has been approved.
应采取措施来隔离外来材料流入生产线，直到它被认可。

Note: The preceding requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
注：上述要求都须合格才能通过 Run @ Rate。

G. PACKAGING AND HANDLING
包装及装卸
1. In process and final shipment packaging will be reviewed for preservation of part quality and ease of use by supplier's operators loading and unloading parts. (Refer to GM 1738 for requirements.)
将检查在生产过程中和最终运输的包装情况以保证零件的质量并且便于供应商的操作人员装卸零件。(参见GM1738中的要求)。
2. The supplier's method for in process and final shipping packaging and handling must effectively eliminate the potential for process errors or mixed stock.
在生产过程中及最终运输时所采用的包装及装卸方式应能有效地杜绝可能的程序差 错及混装。

VI. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REQUIRED
需要做的纠正措施

A. Actual to Requirements. If the results of the actual manufacturing process do not meet customer requirements for on-going quality and quoted tool capacity, corrective action must be taken to correct any non-conformances.
实际产量与用户要求：
如果实际生产过程的结果达不到用户当前质量和声称的工装能力要求，应采取纠正措施消除这些不一致的地方。
B. Actual to Plan. If the manufacturing and quality plan do not agree with the actual process, changes must be made to bring them into agreement.
实际制造与质量计划：
如果实际过程达不到制造和质量计划要求，则应作相应的变动使两者达成一致。
C. Nonconformances. If nonconformances occurred during the Run @ Rate which were not identified previously by the normal PPAP control plan, a corrective action plan needs to be put in place (i.e., error proofing or a change in the control plan) and documented in the PFMEA and/or process flow diagram.
不一致性：
如果在进行Run@Rate中,发生的不合格未能被一般的PPAP控制计划识别,必须采取纠正措施(即防错措施或修改控制计划),并在PFMEA或工艺流程图中记 录。
VII. APPROVAL
审 定
Upon completion of the Run @ Rate, the worksheets must be reviewed for completeness and a decision made whether or not to approve the review. The Run @ Rate can have one of three results: pass; open or fail.
Run @ Rate 一 结 束 ， 应 审 查 工 作 记 录表 以 确 保 完 整 性 ， 同 时 应 作 出 决 定 ： 审 查 是 否 通 过 。 可 以 有 下述 三 种 结 果 之 一 ： 通 过 ， 待 定 ， 失 败 。
A. Pass 通 过
1. Definition 定 义
Pass indicates that all Run @ Rate requirements were met. The supplier demonstrated the capability to produce parts that meet GM's on-going quality requirements at quoted capacity (net output). All key product characteristics were monitored and meet Cpk/Ppk requirements. GP-12 requirements were met. The supplier's actual manufacturing process agreed with the manufacturing and quality plan, as documented by the supplier in PPAP, GP-12 and other required documentation. Quality systems were documented and practiced. 通过意味着满足全部的Run@Rate的要求。表明供应商具备生产出符合GM现行质量要求的产品及具备所要求的生产能力。所有关键的产品性能是在监督测定并且满足CPK/PPK的要求。满足GP12的要求。供应商的实际制造过程符合制造和质量计划，这些规划由供应商记录在PPAP，GP-12和其它要求的文件中。质量体系有成文记录并切实执行。

B. Open 待 定

1. Definition Open indicates that some minor non-conformances to the requirements were found that need to be corrected. Examples of this are net output meets volume requirements but not quoted capacity; quality systems have minor deficiencies (i.e., preventative maintenance system lacking, lack of error proofing, incomplete or inadequate operator instructions/visual aids, operator training not complete, minor deficiencies in