计数型MSA分析表(大样法)培训讲学.xls

计计数数型型MSA有有效效性性分分析析（大大样样法法）ATTRIBUTE GAGE R&R EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS（Large sample method）报告编号Report NO.LG11-2/20150113Part Name/产品名称:D568外后视镜Parameters/测量参数 3MMTOL/公差 0.5Part Number/产品编号:D568-8202Operator A/作业员A xxTrials/试验次数 3Gage Name/量具名称:D568支座检具Operator B/作业员B xxParts/零件样品数 50Gage Number/检具编号:D568-8202100-L9-05Operator C/作业员C xxAppraisers/评价人数 3CharacteristicClassification/特性类别:位置度Judgment modes/判断方式1OK/合格Edit/编制者 XX0NG/不合格Date/日期 2015.07.02Appraiser-Trail/Appraiser-Trail/作作业业员员及及其其试试验验结结果果PartPart#/#/零零件件A-1A-2A-3B-1B-2B-3C-1C-2C-3Ref/Ref/参参考考值值111111111112111110111131101111011400000000005111111111160000000000700000000008000000000090000000000100000000000110000000000121111111111131101111111141111111111151011111111161110111111171111111111181111111111191111111111201111111111211111011111221011110011231111111111241111111111251111111111261111111111271111111111281111111111291111111111301111111111311111111011321111111111331111111101341111111111351111111111361111101111371111111111380000000000391111111111401111111111411111111111420000000000430000000000441111111111451111111111461111101111471111111111481111111111491111111111500000000000Prepared by Richard Li Page 1 of 3DataData Summary/Summary/数数据据总总结结A*BA*CB*CA*RefB*RefC*Ref0*03334333333331*05450000*14354551*1108109107113112112SelfSelf agreement/agreement/自自评评 WithWith reference/reference/与与基基准准一一致致ABCABC464546464546A*B CrosstabulationBTotal0.001.00Po:0.94A0.00Count33437Expected Count9.427.637Pe:0.621.00Count5108113 Expected Count28.684.4113TotalCount38112150Expected Count38.0112.0150B*C CrosstabulationCTotal0.001.00Po:0.93B0.00Count33538Expected Count9.628.438Pe:0.621.00Count5107112Expected Count28.483.6112TotalCount38112150Expected Count38.0112.0150A*C CrosstabulationCTotal0.001.00Po:0.95A0.00Count34337Expected Count9.427.637Pe:0.621.00Count4109113Expected Count28.684.4113TotalCount38112150Expected Count38.0112.0150ReproducibilityA*BB*CA*CKappa0.8400.8240.876ConcludeGoodGoodGoodKappa=(Po-Pe)/(1-Pe)A*REF CrosstabulationREFTotal0.001.00Po:0.97A0.00Count33437Expected Count8.128.937.0Pe:0.641.00Count0113113Expected Count24.988.1113.0TotalCount33117150Expected Count33.0117.0150.0B*REF CrosstabulationREFTotal0.001.00Po:0.97B0.00Count33538Expected Count8.429.638.0Pe:0.641.00Count0112112Expected Count24.687.4112.0TotalCount33117150Expected Count33.0117.0150.0C*REF CrosstabulationREFTotal0.001.00Po:0.97C0.00Count33538Expected Count8.429.638.0Pe:0.641.00Count0112112Expected Count24.687.4112.0TotalCount33117150Expected Count33.0117.0150.0ConcordanceABCKappa0.930.910.91ConcludeGoodGoodGoodRepeatability%AppraiserABCTotal Inspected505050Matched464546%92%90%92%ConcludeGoodGoodGood漏漏发发Conclusion误误发发ConclusionA0.0%Acceptable3.4%AcceptableB0.0%Acceptable4.3%AcceptableC0.0%Acceptable4.3%AcceptablePrepared by Richard Li Page 2 of 3Statistical Report-Attribute Gage R&R Study%Appraiser to Self1%Appraiser Vs Standard2SourceOperator1#Operator2#Operator3#Operator1#Operator2#Operator3#Total Inspected505050505050#Matched46454646454695%UCL97.8%96.7%97.8%97.8%96.7%97.8%Calculated Score92.0%90.0%92.0%92.0%90.0%92.0%95%LCL80.8%78.2%80.8%80.8%78.2%80.8%False Negative(operator biased toward rejection)Std=Pass000False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance)Std=Fail000Mixed(Operator accepts and rejects the same part)454Screen%EffectiveScore3Screen%EffectiveScore vs Standard4Total Inspected5050#in Agreement393995%UCL88.5%88.5%Calculated Score78.0%78.0%95%LCL64.0%64.0%Notes1)Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials 2)Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard3)All operators agreed within and between themselves4)All operators agreed within&between themselves AND agreed with the known standard%Apprraiser to Self1230.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%Efficiency95%UCLCalculated Score95%LCL%Appraiser Vs Standard1230.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%Efficiency95%UCLCalculated Score95%LCL