39EconomicAnalysis.pptx

Click to edit Master text styles,Second level,Third level,Fourth level,Fifth level,#,Click to edit Master title style,1,Economic Analysis,CE 453,Principal source,Wilbur Smith,et al“Guide to the Economic Evaluation of Highway Projects,”Iowa DOT,1993,2,www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/ote/benefit_cost/,A systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project for two purposes:,to determine if it is a sound investment(justification/feasibility),to see how it compares with alternate projects(ranking/priority assignment),3,What You Will Find on This Website,How to define the problem that the project addresses and,set up the analysis,How to measure and value,benefits and costs,of transportation projects,Tools,for calculating benefit-cost measures,dealing with uncertainty,and estimating and valuing benefits and costs that do not have an established monetary value,Benefit-cost models,and links to model sites,Case studies,of benefit-cost analyses for transportation projects,How to interpret and,present results,References,4,Outline,Economic basis,General procedure,Estimating Costs,Estimating Benefits,Comparing costs and benefits,5,Economic Basis,A project has economic value if it increases prosperity and incomes(,is that all,?),This can happen in two ways,Increased output requires more resources(e.g.,attracting business),Increased efficiency(lower cost of production),Never measured but quite important the reorganization of production!,Too much investment wastes resources,too little stifles business and productivity,Economic analysis doesnt include everything,6,7,General Procedure,Summary of chart on slide 6,Identify project and options,Select base case,Traffic analysis and forecasts,Estimate capital and operations costs,Calculate travel efficiency cost savings,Calculate feasibility from user perspective,8,Summary of chart on slide 6(cont.),Estimate economic development impacts,Calculate feasibility from economic development perspective,Conduct sensitivity analysis,Interpret results,Include economic analysis with non-economic factors in making decisionGeneral Procedure,9,Estimating Costs,Capital cost,Engineers estimate is best(See summary of bid prices and example plans),Can use unit cost from experience,See list of typical elements,next page,Do not include sunk costs,Allow for a salvage(residual)value and discount it(see next page),10,11,Operations and maintenance cost,Estimating Costs,12,Cost Side:Preparing costs for B/C,13,Summary:Estimating Costs,Capital cost,Operations and maintenance cost,Preparing costs(time value)for B/C,14,Estimating Benefits,Analysis procedure,15,16,Accident(Crash)cost savings,Years lost+direct costs,1991 cost of fatality,$2,392,742(Urban Institute)biased?,Willingness to pay(e.g.,for a safety improvement),Missouri and Kansas,$1.5M(1993),Iowa,$800,000(2002),Estimating Benefits,17,18,19,Travel time savings,Factors,Size of time increment saved(100%for over 11 minutes),Occupancy,Purpose,Willingness to pay,Estimating Benefits,20,21,Vehicle operating cost savings,Fuel,oil,maintenance,etc.,See Red book and many references,Estimating Benefits,22,Economic Development Benefits,Development principles and types,Corridor,State,Nation,Some indicators,Economic activity,Value added,Income,Employment,Population,23,Economic Development Benefits,Four categories,Construction impact,Roadside expenditures,Competitive reposition,Non-business,24,Economic Development Benefits,Economic models,Input/output,25,Summary:Estimating Benefits,Accident(Crash)cost savings,Travel time savings,Auto,Truck,Vehicle operating cost savings,Economic Development Benefits,Development principles and types,Economic models,26,Comparing costs and benefits,Life cycle approach,Choose base year,Include all present and future costs/benefits,27,Comparing costs and benefits,Discount future costs and benefits,Net present value,Benefit/cost ratio,Internal rate of return,Choice of discount rate is tricky and VERY important over long time periods,28,Comparing costs and benefits,Decision rules,Maximize net present value,Use incremental rate of return to compare projects(not just B/C compared to do-nothing),Limited budgets affect choice of project(may not be overall best B/C or IROR),29,Comparing costs and benefits,Uncertainty,sensitivity and risks,Vary the following,Discount rate,Capital costs(20%),Traffic volumes(20%),Crash values(use FHWA?),Value of time(FHWA?),Higher posted speed,30,Comparing costs and benefits,Future research neededValue of crashes,Agriculture impacts,Logistics impacts,Industrial location,REMI sub-state regions,Urban methods,VOC methods,Super 2 analysis,31,Summary:Comparing costs and benefits,Life cycle approach,Discount future costs and benefits,Decision rules,Uncertainty,sensitivity and risks,Future research needed,32,Example,See,HRGreen Benefit/Cost Analysis Spreadsheet,