ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:14 ,大小:214.50KB ,
资源ID:8882738      下载积分:10 金币
快捷注册下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

开通VIP
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.zixin.com.cn/docdown/8882738.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载【60天内】不扣币)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

开通VIP折扣优惠下载文档

            查看会员权益                  [ 下载后找不到文档?]

填表反馈(24小时):  下载求助     关注领币    退款申请

开具发票请登录PC端进行申请

   平台协调中心        【在线客服】        免费申请共赢上传

权利声明

1、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
2、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,个别因单元格分列造成显示页码不一将协商解决,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
3、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
4、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前可先查看【教您几个在下载文档中可以更好的避免被坑】。
5、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
6、文档遇到问题,请及时联系平台进行协调解决,联系【微信客服】、【QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【版权申诉】”,意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:0574-28810668;投诉电话:18658249818。

注意事项

本文(CNAP文献的摘要翻译.doc)为本站上传会员【仙人****88】主动上传,咨信网仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知咨信网(发送邮件至1219186828@qq.com、拔打电话4009-655-100或【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】),核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载【60天内】不扣币。 服务填表

CNAP文献的摘要翻译.doc

1、A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU AM Jagadeesh, Naveen G Singh, Subramanyam Mahankali Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and

2、 Research, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India Abstract Accurate measurement and display of arterial blood pressure is essential for rational management of adult cardiac surgical patients. Because of the lower risk of complications, noninvasive monitoring methods gain importance. A newly developed contin

3、uous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (CNAP™) monitor is available and has been validated perioperatively. In a prospective study we compared the CNAP™ monitoring device with invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) measurement in 30 patients in a cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patient

4、s were either mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing, with or without inotropes. CNAP™ was applied on two fingers of the hand contralateral to the IAP monitoring catheter. Systolic, diastolic and mean pressure data were recorded every minute for 2 h simultaneously for both IAP and CNAP™.

5、 Statistical analysis included construction of mountain plot and Bland Altman plots for assessing limits of agreement and bias (accuracy) calculation. Three thousand and six hundred pairs of data were analyzed. The CNAP™ systolic arterial pressure bias was 10.415 mmHg and the CNAP™ diastolic arteria

6、l pressure bias was −5.3386 mmHg; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of CNAP™ was close to the MAP of IAP, with a bias of 0.03944 mmHg. The Bland Altman plot showed a uniform distribution and a good agreement of all arterial blood pressure values between CNAP™ and IAP. Percentage within limits of agre

7、ement was 94.5%, 95.1% and 99.4% for systolic, diastolic and MAP. Calculated limits of agreement were −4.60 to 25.43, −13.38 to 2.70 and −5.95 to 6.03 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and mean BP, respectively. The mountain plot showed similar results as the Bland Altman plots. We conclude CNAP™ is a re

8、liable, noninvasive, continuous blood pressure monitor that provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable to those generated by an invasive arterial catheter system. CNAP™ can be used as an alternative to IAP. Keywords: Arterial blood pressure, Continuous noninvasive arterial pressur

9、e, Monitoring Comput Biol Med. 2013 Oct 1;43(10):1583-9. doi: 10.1016/pbiomed.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Evaluation of a novel automated non-invasive pulse pressure variation algorithm. Schmid M, Prettenthaler H, Weger C, Smolle KH. Author information Abstract In mechanically ventilate

10、d patients, Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) has been shown to be a useful parameter to guide fluid management. We evaluated a real-time automated PPV-algorithm by comparing it to manually calculated PPV-values. In 10 critically ill patients, blood pressure was measured invasively (IBP) and non-invasi

11、vely (CNAP(®) Monitor, CNSystems Medizintechnik, Austria). PPV was determined manually and compared to automated PPV values: PPVmanIBP vs. PPVautoIBP was -0.19 ± 1.65% (mean bias ± standard deviation), PPVmanCNAP vs. PPVautoCNAP was -1.02 ± 2.03% and PPVautoCNAP vs. PPVmanIBP was -2.10 ± 3.14%, sugg

12、esting that the automated CNAP(®) PPV-algorithm works well on both blood pressure waveforms but needs further clinical evaluation. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: CNAP(®) Monitor 500, Continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, Fluid management, Mechanical vent

13、ilation, Pulse pressure variation, Vascular unloading Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):76-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182910df5. Epub 2013 May 17. The accuracy and responsiveness of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure during rapid ventricular pacing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

14、 Schramm C, Huber A, Plaschke K. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: The accuracy of measurement of the continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (CNAP) technique is unknown during sudden cardiocirculatory arrest. METHODS: In 33 patients undergoing elective transfemoral aortic valve

15、 implantation procedures under analgesic sedation, invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) was compared with a CNAP device during episodes of severe hypotension (functional cardiocirculatory arrests by rapid pacing) and the remaining time without severe hypotension. Systolic, diastolic, and mean pair

16、s of blood pressure measurements were extracted for both groups and were analyzed by Bland-Altman plots. The responsiveness of the CNAP technique was assessed in the various phases of severe hypotension concerning time and amplitude of changes. RESULTS: Overall CNAP accuracy (bias), calculated by

17、subtracting IAP from CNAP, was -6.3 ± 18.9, 7.4 ± 10.5, and 4.0 ± 11.3 mm Hg (mean ± SD, systolic, diastolic, and mean). Bias increased during episodes of severe hypotension to 11.8 ± 14.5, 13.8 ± 12.4, and 12.9 ± 12.4 mm Hg. The percentage of agreements (95% confidence interval) between the blood p

18、ressure pairs with a difference ≤15 mm Hg was 58.5% (57.9-58.6), 75.8% (75.5-76.0), 82.2% (81.9-82.4; systolic, diastolic, mean) for all data and 56.4% (54.2-58.9; P = 0.71), 53.2%* (51.1-56.0), and 57.4%* (56.3-59.1; *P < 0.001) during rapid pacing. The responsiveness of mean CNAP and mean IAP did

19、not differ significantly during the various phases of rapid pacing. CONCLUSIONS: The stand-alone CNAP monitor (model 500at, software V3.5) accurately and rapidly measures the changes of blood pressure that occur during sudden development of cardiocirculatory arrest and recovery to baseline blood p

20、ressures. CNAP monitors the duration of the arrest. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun;25(4):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 May 17. Accuracy of the CNAP monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure readings in the prone position

21、 Dewhirst E, Corridore M, Klamar J, Beebe A, Rice J, Barry N, Tobias JD. Author information Abstract STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a noninvasive continuous arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor in patients who are positioned prone in the operating room. DESIGN: Prospective study. SE

22、TTING: Operating room at a children's hospital. PATIENTS: 20 pediatric patients, aged 13.8 ± 2 years, and weight 63.7 ± 18.8 kg, scheduled for surgery in the prone position, and for which arterial catheter placement was planned. INTERVENTIONS: Measurements were recorded with an arterial line (A

23、L) and a new noninvasive continuous blood pressure (BP) monitor. MEASUREMENTS: Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) pressure readings were captured from an arterial cannula and theCNAP device every minute during anesthesia. MAIN RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of analysis

24、 of 4104 pairs of SBP, DBP, and MAP values, which showed an absolute difference between the AL and CNAP device readings of 7.9 ± 6.3 mmHg for SBP, 5.3 ± 4.3 mmHg for DBP, and 4.6 ± 3.9 mmHg for MAP. Bland-Altman analysis of MAP values showed a bias of 0.26 mmHg, with upper and lower limits of agreem

25、ent of 12.18 mmHg and -11.67 mmHg, respectively. CNAP readings deviated from arterial values by ≤ 5 mmHg in 67% of MAP values, 59% of DBP values, and 43% of SBP readings. The difference was ≤ 10 mmHg for 94% of MAP readings, 90% of DBP values, and 73% of SBP readings. CONCLUSIONS: During prone pos

26、itioning, the CNAP monitor provided clinically acceptable accuracy for MAP values, similar to those reported in adults in the supine position. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: Anesthesia, Blood pressure monitoring devices, Hemodynamics, Hypotension, Pediatric, Pediatr

27、ics, intraoperative Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Nov;23(11):989-93. doi: 10.1111/pan.12173. Epub 2013 Apr 9. Accuracy of the CNAP™ monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure readings in pediatric patients weighing 20-40 kilograms. Kako H, Corri

28、dore M, Rice J, Tobias JD. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: During perioperative care, the continuous measurement of blood pressure (BP) provides superior physiologic monitoring to intermittent techniques. However, such monitoring requires placement of an intraarterial catheter, which may

29、 be time-consuming or associated with adverse events and technical difficulty. A noninvasive, continuous BP monitoring device has been studied in the adult population. This study prospectively assesses its accuracy in pediatric patients, weighing 20-40 kg. METHODS: The technology evaluated is the

30、CNAP™ Monitor 500, developed by CNSystems AG (Graz, Austria). The study cohort included pediatric patients weighing between 20 and 40 kg, scheduled for surgery for which arterial line (AL) placement was planned. Systolic (sBP), diastolic (dBP), and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure readings were ca

31、ptured from the AL and the CNAP™ device every minute during anesthetic care. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 20 patients (11 weighing between 30 and 40 kg and 9 weighing between 20 and 29.9 kg) with a mean age of 9.8 ± 3.4 years (range, 6-16 years) and weight of 29.8 ± 6.1 kg (range, 20.9-3

32、8.7 kg). There were a total of 1076 pairs each of sBP, dBP, and MAP values in the 20-29.9 kg group. The absolute difference between the sBP, dBP, and MAP was 9.8 ± 8.5, 6.8 ± 5.3, and 6.7 ± 6.2 mmHg, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the AL and the CNAP™ device was 0.48, 0.60, and 0.

33、64 for the sBP, dBP, and MAP, respectively. The CNAP™ values (sBP, dBP, MAP) were ≤5 mmHg from the AL values in 38.6%, 48.5%, and 55.0% of the values, respectively. In the 30-40 kg group, there were a total of 2737 pairs of sBP, dBP, and MAP values. The absolute difference between the sBP, dBP, and

34、MAP was 11.5 ± 9.3, 7.5 ± 5.3, and 7.9 ± 6.6 mmHg, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the arterial cannula and the CNAP™ device was 0.48, 0.45, and 0.51 for the sBP, dBP, and MAP, respectively. CNAP™ readings were ≤5 mmHg from the AL values (sBP, dBP, MAP) in 29.0%, 41.9%, and 40.5% o

35、f the values, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although some variation in its accuracy was noted, the CNAP™ device provides a noninvasive and continuous blood pressure reading which appears to be within clinically useful limits. It may be that modification of the finger cuffs is needed to improve its abs

36、olute accuracy as our clinical experience demonstrated that achieving an effective fit with the cuffs was at times difficult. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. KEYWORDS: arterial blood pressure, blood pressure monitors, pediatrics Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Apr;57(4):468-73. doi: 10.1111/aas.

37、12028. Epub 2012 Nov 27. CNAP(®) does not reliably detect minimal or maximal arterial blood pressures during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Gayat E, Mongardon N, Tuil O, Sievert K, Chazot T, Liu N, Fischler M. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: CNAP(®) provides continuo

38、us non-invasive arterial pressure (AP) monitoring. We assessed its ability to detect minimal and maximal APs during induction of general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Invasive pressure monitoring was est

39、ablished at the radial artery, and CNAP monitoring using a finger sensor recording was begun before induction. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Patients' median age was 67 year

40、s [interquartile range (59-76)], median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 [interquartile range (2-3)]. Bias was 5 and -7 mmHg for peak and nadir systolic AP (SAP), with upper and lower limits of agreement of (42:-32) and (27;-42), respectively. The corresponding ICC values were 0.74

41、[95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.57-0.84] and 0.60 (95% CI = 0.44-0.73). Time lags to reach these values were 7.5 s (95% CI = -10.0 to 60.0) for the highest SAP and 10 s (95% CI = -12.5 to 72.5) for the lowest SAP. Bias, lower and upper limits of agreement for diastolic, and mean AP were -14 (-36 t

42、o 9) and -12 (-37 to 13) for the nadir value and -7 (-29 to 15) and -2 (-28 to 25) for the peak value. CONCLUSIONS: The CNAP monitor could detect acute change in AP within a reasonable time lag. Precision of its measurements is not satisfactory, and therefore, it could only serve as a clue to the

43、occurrence of changes in AP. © 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):413-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes224. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Detection of hypotension during Caesarean section with continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device or intermittent oscillo

44、metric arterial pressure measurement. Ilies C, Kiskalt H, Siedenhans D, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, Bein B, Hanss R. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: The intensified use of spinal anaesthesia (SPA) for Caesarean section significantly contributed to a decreased maternal mortality and morbidit

45、y. Nevertheless, one of the major side-effects is hypotension after SPA with potential negative effects on the fetus. Owing to discontinuous oscillometric measurements (non-invasive arterial pressure, NIAP), hypotensive episodes may be missed. Recently, a continuous NIAP measurement device (CNAP) wi

46、th acceptable agreement with the mean invasive AP was introduced. We hypothesized that CNAP detects hypotensive episodes more reliably compared with NIAP measurements. METHODS: A total of 65 women undergoing Caesarean section under SPA were included in the study analysis. A total of 888 NIAP measu

47、rements obtained at 3 min cycles, starting from before SPA and continued until delivery, were analysed. RESULTS: When averaged over all cycles, the lowest systolic AP identified by CNAP in each cycle [105 mm Hg, (24.4)] was significantly lower (P<0.001) than the average of the individual correspon

48、ding single NIAP measurements [126 mm Hg (22.1)] and highest CNAP average [126 mm Hg (24.5)]. Hypotension (systolic AP <100 mm Hg) was detected in 39% of all cycles with CNAP and in 9% with NIAP. Hypotension was detected in 91% of the patients based on CNAP and in 55% based on NIAP. Fetal acidosis d

49、efined by an umbilical vein pH under 7.25 did not occur when the lowest systolic AP measured by CNAP was above 100 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The CNAP device detected more hypotensive episodes after SPA and significantly lower AP compared with NIAP. AP monitoring based on CNAP may improve haemodynamic management in this patient population with potential benefit for the fetus. Ann Card Anaesth. 2012 Jul-Sep;15(3):180-4. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.97973. A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac su

移动网页_全站_页脚广告1

关于我们      便捷服务       自信AI       AI导航        抽奖活动

©2010-2025 宁波自信网络信息技术有限公司  版权所有

客服电话:0574-28810668  投诉电话:18658249818

gongan.png浙公网安备33021202000488号   

icp.png浙ICP备2021020529号-1  |  浙B2-20240490  

关注我们 :微信公众号    抖音    微博    LOFTER 

客服