企业绩效管理讲座（英文版）.docx

28, 2019

:

a

a a . , .

, a “” . . , — — ’t “ .”

: . 30%, . . . . . “ ,” .

: . a — . ; . ’s , .

: , ’d , . a : “ ?”

“ ’s ,” .

“ ?” . “ a . ’t . ?”

, . , 70% ’s . “Why CEOs Fail,” by Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin, Fortune magazine, June 21, 1999.
, . ’s ? , ’t .

a . “ ,” ’t . . , “,” . ’t , , . , ’t , .

a “ ”
a , . , . ? ’s . “” — , , — ’s . . , “ ” , ’s .

’ , . a “ .” A 1) , , ; 2) .

A ’t , a . , . — ? :

1. . ’t. , . ’s ’s . , “” —’ 100 — . a — .
2. . , . : ; ; ; . . a “ ,” .

3. . , ’t. . . ’ , a .

, , . . . . . , .

— — . ? , , a .

a . 35% a , , a & . Based on a study conducted by Sarah Mavrinac and Tony Siesfeld for the Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation.
“ ” “ ” 22 . , a , , — a ’s . “ a ,” .

1.
, .

A Hay Group partnered with Richard Hackman of Harvard University and Ruth Wageman of Dartmouth College to identify the dynamics of top executive teams and their impact on performance. From an initial group of 48 teams, the researchers narrowed their study to 14 teams, many from large global organizations. Each team member represented the head of an organization, a major business division, or a major geography.
a ( ’s ). . . . 1.

1:
58%
一八%
1: . . . “” . 20% . “” 58% 一八% .

[ “: , .” ]

a
. 2 . a . , 57% a .

2:

% Source: Hay Group, Inc. The results are from our Employee Attitude Survey, which sampled some 300 companies representing more than 1 million workers. Our survey queried management, professionals, salespeople, information technologists, and clerical and hourly workers. The “gap” referred to in the table is the “satisfaction gap” between workers planning to leave within two years and those planning to stay longer.

:
(%)
(%)

(%)
1.
83%
49%
34%
2.
74%
41%
33%
3.
57%
27%
30%
[; 3; ]

? . ? “” , .

, , ’t . , , a . , a . “” , , , . ’t . a “ .”

“’t ’t a , ’ ?” .

“ ?” , . a , .

. , , a a 249 () . . 100 , ’t .

“ , . “ , .” , .

’s , . , . ’s , .

. : . , , 's . .

, . "I , , . " ." 'd 's , , .

, , . . , . a " " .

"" . , " . , 't . ?" , , . . " , , ," . .

A " ."
. "
," . " , . , , ."

2.
, ? . ’t, ’t ’t “ ” . : ’t ’t ; ’t, ; , ’t .

. () , , . 1999 2001, 20 2.4 . 57 , . , , .

1999 $200 ’s , . , , ,

, , ’s 5 , a “” 6 . 10-一五 . ’s 20 . $440,000 a $2 , $10,000 .

? , , . :

a “ ,” . a . ’s , , a , , .

, . , 5%. a , a . ’s , a , “” , . “ , ’t .”

“ ” . . ’s 50 — 5 . ? . , , , .

. “ ” . “ ,” , ’ . , .

, . . a “ , .” a . : a 12 . “ ,” . “” , . , ’s . !

’s
. . , a , ’t . .

, , . a . . , . .

, , ’t . ’s “ a . . “ , ’t ,” . “ a , .”

a . a , — — . “ , , ’s ,” .

3:

[’S : “Y” “ ”

: a “” — a “ .

. , $600 a $2.5 1994-2000, 70 “ ” () .

. . , , . , , a , . , a .

a . “” . . a . , . a , , 10 5 .

“’” “”
. . “ a a a . .”

“ ’t ,” , , a . “ , ’ . .”

, . ’t . , , 259 . , , . a , — — a .

’t
, (“ ”) . a , . — — . , . , , , “ . , .” ( .)

3.

— ’t — . .

. a ’s “ ” . . , , , .

A , , , a . , , . , . , . , . ? , , “ a .” , . , , .

, a . . . . , . , . .

. . 4 —— a 75 . .

4: : 2001 Source: Hay Compensation Report, involving some 75 companies in the U.S.

2001
()
6.07%

4.10%

1.97%

(: ,

A . 335 , 35% ’d .

5: , I .

[’S ” “Y “ ”; 1 2 . , 1-100]

— — . , , —“ ( 20%)— . . ( 10%) .”

. ’s . a “ ” “ ,” , , . . a . . . ’t : . ’t , — — . , , , —“ ,” .

, ., . “ ,” , .

A a . , ( 20% ), . , a “ ,” . , , “ ” , . . . ’s ’s .

6: ?

A . a .

[’S ” “Y” “ ”; 1 2 ]

. a . . , . . $10 , . , . .

, a $600 , . “ ,” , . , a ’s 4.5% . .

“ ,” . 3.5%— . (4.5% 3.5% “” ) 25% . “ ” 7一五% . , “” . .

. “” . , ’s . . a . .

a . — — , , . . .

[]

1. . — . a . , . . .

: I . , a . ’s a .

: I . ’s .

2. : , . , , .

: ( .) . I ’t . .

: ( , a .) ’t .

3. . a . ’t . . . , .

: a . “ .” ? ’t . ?

: .

4. , , . , ( ) . . , . . , a .

: , ’ ’ . ’s .

: ( ) I .