HBSethicaldilemmaessaysample-ACandidLookAtHBS’NewA.doc

HBS ethical dilemma essay sample
同志们，千万记住，分享的目的是让大家了解到写的深度和表达方式。一定要写自己的故事，有自己的风格。

“Discuss an ethical dilemma that you experienced firsthand. How did you manage and resolve the situation?”

I was one of two consultants who conducted an independent assessment for a major financial services company. We were sponsored by its IT organization to assess the alignment of IT services to the various divisions and geographic locations of the business. During our assessment, we met with fifty of the top business leaders across four countries, including the CFO and CIO. We solicited their ideas fhttp://www.ukassignment.org/essayfw/19675.htmlor improvement and performed a statistical analysis of the results. When we shared the analysis with IT leadership, they asked us to remove some of the findings that reflected poorly upon their management practices before we reported the results to the business leaders.

I was one of two consultants who conducted an independent assessment for a major financial services company. We were sponsored by its IT organization to assess the alignment of IT services to the various divisions and geographic locations of the business. During our assessment, we met with fifty of the top business leaders across four countries, including the CFO and CIO. We solicited their ideas for improvement and performed a statistical analysis of the results. When we shared the analysis with IT leadership, they asked us to remove some of the findings that reflected poorly upon their management practices before we reported the results to the business leaders.

Our dilemma was whether to report our independent finds to the business leaders against the wishes of IT leadership ( who included our project sponsor) or to heed their request and dilute the findings. On the on hand, we reported to our project sponsor who paid our consulting fees and was our main contact at the company. On the other hand, we risked jeopardizing our credibility with the leaders who had shared politically risky examples with us because they viewed the “ independent” assessment as a vehicle for bringing about meaningful changes in the organization.

In order to address this dilemma, my colleague and I met to consider our options. Our reflection yielded one conclusion with two potential solutions. We concluded that all parties included in the assessment deserved to know the true findings of our study. As a result, we needed to either convince our sponsor that it was in his best interests to share the complete findings or find a way to show the limitations of the report’s independence without alienating him.

Ultimately, both solutions were necessary. During meetings with our sponsor, we pointed out that the business leaders would clearly identify the withholdings, which would compromise IT’s credibility. We also noted that omitting results would contradict the assessment’s goal of binging about constructive changes. Our sponsor accepted the validity of our arguments and reduced the number of omissions. However, since full disclosure was not an option for the IT organization, we also worked collaboratively with our sponsor to include a section in the presentation about the process used to conduct the assessment that clearly identified the input that IT leadership had to the results. This approach was ultimately satisfactory to IT leadership. It also provided the necessary flag to alert the business leaders to the withholding from our final presentation.
更多申请 essay信息参考：
申请Kellogg mba essay要求《Kellogg MBA Essay -Topics & Deadlines》：http://www.ukassignment.org/dxsqessay/2012/0806/19673.html
HBS MBA成功申请essay格式案例：HBS MBA Class of 2015 (including 2+2)http://www.ukassignment.org/dxsqessay/2012/0803/19668.html
___
HBS MBA 招生新变化解读：A Candid Look At HBS’ New Admit Changes
by John A. Byrne

Shortly after the unveiling of the new Harvard Business School application, with its changed essay set Poets&Quants interviewed Sanford “Sandy” Kreisberg, the founder of HBS, an admission consultancy which focuses on HBS and other leading business schools. Kreisberg has been consulting with applicants since the 1970s and has seen more than a dozen iterations of HBS applications, including the one Harvard MBA Admissions & Financial Aid Managing Director “Dee” Leopold herself filed with eight essay questions. (He was not Dee’s consultant). He also typically does over 100 mock interviews for HBS candidates and writes the perennially favorite Poets&Quants’ weekly feature handicapping the odds of MBA applicants. As always, Sandy was his provocative self.

PQ: So Sandy, what do you think is driving this?

SK: Well, it could be the admissions office picking up a hint from some direct or off-the-cuff remark from the new Dean, Nitin Nohria, who has been ‘disruptive’ himself in his first years, especially the initiation of the Field Program (of trips and business plans) to the first year curriculum and who seems to like to shake things up. It could be Dee Leopold wanting to make changes for the sake of changes, pre-empting a seven-year itch (she has been the adcom head for six years now). It could be “innovation envy,” a feeling that with the whole school running around and hiring coders to start companies, as part of the Field Program, well, admissions had to make a splash as well. It could be all of the above.

PQ: What is you assessment of who this helps and who this hurts?

SK: It turns the application into something like a law school application, where they have your grades, your standardized test scores, and a couple of short essays. That helps people with high grades and high GMATs and a clear and branded work pedigree. It hurts non-traditional candidates, who have less room to explain themselves initially, and it hurts traditional candidates who were on the bubble, and also wanted to explain themselves. One word you don’t hear about in this application is “leadership”– which used to be the one-word description of HBS and a keystone of its motto, “to develop leaders who make a difference in the world.” What they appear to looking for now are high-achievers who are hip to starting disruptive things, however defined, and new businesses. “Disruption potential” has replaced “Leadership potential” as the new buzz words. Call it the Post-Zuckerberg effect. Well, the alternative –reality Zuckerberg Effect, they want Zuckerberg-types who did not drop out, and instead get good grades, good jobs, and found their “disruptive” Zuckerberg mojo later in life.

PQ: But how is that reflected in the new application?

SK: First, by the very fact that is new, and disruptive itself, “Hey look at us, we can innovate too!!” Second, by {Admission Director] Dee’s oft-stated and now even more clear obsession, especially in 2+2 candidates, with STEM applicants. (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math). STEM and Disruption have now replaced Leadership and Old-Fashioned Change (“change” was a hot HBS topic five years ago, and a required essay) as some useful clichés in understanding admissions policies and fancies. The fact they have slimmed down the essay part, and jettisoned such classic questions as “Describe three significant accomplishments” and “Describe three set-backs.” They even jettisoned, “What do you wish we had asked?” which is a pretty blue-sky question. So last year, you had to come up with seven stories (3 accomplishments, 3 set-backs and one blue sky event, what do you wish we had asked) over 1600 words, plus some goals blah, blah blah which could also be creative, all of which took some real digging around in your life and thinking about what matters to you, and then strategically picking seven value-adding and representative stories, while this year, it is more high-stakes, more like a business plan, where you need less writing but one “bet the ranch” what are you good at idea, and one “Hey, I’m a work in progress because . . .” idea.

P&Q: Let’s take a look at the actual questions: Tell us something you’ve done well and tell us something you wish you had done better.

SK: There is one word to describe the tone and content of those prompts-California.

The very removal off the word ‘accomplishment’ for the more touchy-feely ‘something you’ve done well’ and the banning of the judgmental ‘set-back’ for the infantile and Little-Train-Who- Could ‘something you wish you had done better’ is a way of signaling , “We Don’t Need No Real Accomplishments or Set-backs” (well, of course, aside from getting into ace feeder colleges, getting strong grades and solid GMATs and working for traditional feeder firms), you can just riff on this.

But, of course, I am just being analytical and old school. The most important part of the new application is the naked fact that the initial essay set has been reduced, as you noted, from 2000 to 800 words.

PQ: Meaning?

SK: Words don’t count so much, or more charitably and probably more accurately, “Folks, we get the idea about you real fast. You’re a start-up, we just need the elevator pitch. We don’t need you to explain it to us. We know what we want and we know a future HBS admit when we see one.”(责任编辑：留学生作业)

留学生作业网提供 www.ukassignment.org 代写essay,代写assignment，qq1455780998，email: 1455780998@