ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:4 ,大小:908.12KB ,
资源ID:755721      下载积分:8 金币
验证码下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
验证码: 获取验证码
温馨提示:
支付成功后,系统会自动生成账号(用户名为邮箱或者手机号,密码是验证码),方便下次登录下载和查询订单;
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

开通VIP
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.zixin.com.cn/docdown/755721.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载【60天内】不扣币)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  
声明  |  会员权益     获赠5币     写作写作

1、填表:    下载求助     索取发票    退款申请
2、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
3、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
4、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
5、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前自行私信或留言给上传者【老金】。
6、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
7、本文档遇到问题,请及时私信或留言给本站上传会员【老金】,需本站解决可联系【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【 服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【 版权申诉】”(推荐),意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:4008-655-100;投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100。

注意事项

本文(2024+WFNS建议:保守治疗在腰椎间盘突出症中的作用.pdf)为本站上传会员【老金】主动上传,咨信网仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知咨信网(发送邮件至1219186828@qq.com、拔打电话4008-655-100或【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】),核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载【60天内】不扣币。 服务填表

2024+WFNS建议:保守治疗在腰椎间盘突出症中的作用.pdf

1、World Neurosurgery:X 22(2024)100277Available online 13 February 20242590-1397/2024 The Authors.Published by Elsevier Inc.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).The role of conservative treatment in lumbar disc herniations:WFNS s

2、pine committee recommendations Onur Yamana,Artem Guchkhab,Sandeep Vaishyac,Mehmet Zilelid,*,Corinna Zygourakise,Joachim Oertelf aDepartment of Neurosurgery,Memorial Bahelievler Hospital,Istanbul,Turkiye bDepartment of Neurosurgery,Research Center of Neurology,Moscow,Russia cDepartment of Neurosurger

3、y,Fortis Memorial Research Institute,Guragaon and Fortis Hospital Vasant Kunj,New Delhi,India dDepartment of Neurosurgery,Sanko University Faculty of Medicine,Gaziantep,Turkiye eDepartment of Neurosurgery,Stanford University School of Medicine,Stanford,CA,USA fDepartment of Neurosurgery,Saarland Uni

4、versity Medical Centre,Homburg,Germany A R T I C L E I N F O Keywords:Lumbar disc herniation Conservative therapy Low back pain Radiculopathy WFNS spine committee A B S T R A C T Objective:To formulate the most current,evidence-based recommendations for the conservative management of lumbar disc her

5、niations(LDH).Methods:A systematic literatre search was performed 20122022 in PubMed/Medline and Cochrane using the keywords lumbar disc herniation and conservative treatment,yielding 342 total manuscripts.Screening criteria resulted in 12 final manuscripts which were summarized and presented at two

6、 international consensus meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies(WFNS)Spine Committee.The Delphi method was utilized to arrive at three final consensus statements.Results and conclusion:s:In the absence of cauda equina syndrome,motor,or other serious neurologic deficits,conservat

7、ive treatment should be the first line of treatment for LDH.NSAIDs may significantly improve acute low back and sciatic pain caused by LDH.A combination of activity modification,pharmacotherapy,and physical therapy provides good outcomes in most LDH patients.1.Introduction Lumbar disc herniation(LDH

8、)is the most common degenerative disease of the spine,with a prevalence of 23%.1 Nevertheless,only a small percentage of patients(10%)are candidates for surgical inter-vention.2 Red flags that necessitate urgent surgery include progressive significant weakness of the lower extremities and/or cauda e

9、quina syndrome.In the absence of red flag symptoms,conservative ther-apyincluding non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs or narcotic medi-cations,physical therapy,and/or epidural transforaminal injectionsshould be the first line of treatment.3 In this paper,we re-view the recent literature and summariz

10、e the results of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies(WFNS)Spine Committee consensus meeting for the role of conservative therapy in LDH.2.Methods We performed a literature search in Pubmed,Medline and Cochrane 20122022 using the keywords lumbar disc herniation and con-servative treatment

11、.Initial search yielded 342 manuscripts.We excluded duplicate articles,those without full text available,non-English articles,non-human studies,and case reports with 50 pa-tients.These screening criteria(as shown in Fig.1)resulted in 12 final articles that covered the following topics1:Type of conse

12、rvative therapy used for LDH,and2 Effectiveness of conservative therapy in treating LDH(see Table 1).These data were summarised and presented at two international meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies(WFNS)Spine Committee,the first in Karachi,Pakistan and the second in Istanbul

13、,Turkey.Participants voted on consensus statements using the following Likert scale:1=strongly disagree,2=disagree,3=some-what agree,4=agree,5=strongly agree.All voters were attending neurosurgeons who are spine experts and members of the WFNS*Corresponding author.E-mail addresses:(O.Yaman),(M.Zilel

14、i).Contents lists available at ScienceDirect World Neurosurgery:X journal homepage: https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100277 Received 28 July 2023;Received in revised form 18 November 2023;Accepted 1 February 2024 World Neurosurgery:X 22(2024)1002772committee.Results are presented as percentage of

15、respondents who agree35 and those who diagree.1,2 Consensus was achieved when agreement or disagreement were66%,respectively.3.Results and discussion 3.1.Definition of“conservative therapy”The term conservative therapy refers to all treatment modalities for LDH except surgery.This includes pharmacol

16、ogical and non-pharmacological treatments including physical therapy,injections,and other minimally-invasive procedures,as discussed below.3.2.Pharmacological therapy 3.2.1.Acetaminophen Both the American Pain Society(APS)and the American College of Physicians(ACP)recommend acetaminophen as the firs

17、t-line of treat-ment against low back pain of any duration.Although it might be not be as effective as other agents for severe pain,it is still the first choice due to its low adverse effects.4 3.2.2.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)NSAIDs inhibit cyclooxygenase-1(COX-1)and cyclooxygenase

18、-2(COX-2)enzymes,resulting in anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects,and are frequently used for discogenic pain.In Roelofs et al.s Cochrane review,the authors stated that non-selective NSAIDs are superior to placebo for relieving low back pain without the need for additional analgesics.5 There is

19、no published evidence that one individual NSAID is superior to another for treating LDH pain.3.2.3.Muscle relaxants The term muscle relaxant is used for the group of medications that relax skeletal muscles via various mechanisms.One commonly used group is thiocolchicoside,a GABA-mimetic drug,which a

20、lso has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects.Other agents like carisoprodol(soma),cyclobenzaprine(flexeril),and metalaxone(skelaxin)can also be used for the treatment of acute low back pain,despite known side effects such as gastrointestinal problems,dizziness,and headaches.6 Muscle relaxants lik

21、e the calcium-channel blocker dantrolene or the gamma-aminobutyric acid modulator baclofen should generally not be used for treatment of low back pain,as their therapeutic purposes are Abbreviations WFNS World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies MRI Magnetic resonance imaging CT Computed tomograph

22、y PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses LDH Lumbar disc herniation APS American Pain Society ACP American College of Physicians NSAIDs Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs COX-2 Cyclooxygenase-2 Fig.1.Flowchart depicting screening algorithm for papers.O.Yaman et a

23、l.World Neurosurgery:X 22(2024)1002773aimed for treatment for muscle stiffness related to spinal cord injuries,cerebral palsy,or stroke.4 3.2.4.Opiods The use of opiods for the treatment of low back pain is controversial due to serious side effects including physical dependency and with-drawal sympt

24、oms such as as gastrointestinal discomfort,irritability,and headaches.In fact,Alford reported that chronic back pain is commonly used as an excuse for long-term opioid prescriptions and does not positively affect quality of life or reduce symptoms.7 High-quality data for the long-term use of opiods

25、specifically for LDH-related pain is lacking.Nevertheless,Tramadol,a-opiate agonist acting as a norepi-nephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor,is shown to have remarkably beneficial effects on radicular pain caused by LDH,with fewer adverse effects than other opioids.8 3.3.Non-pharmacological trea

26、tment 3.3.1.Physical therapy Physical therapy plays an important role in the management of dis-cogenic pain.Back extension exercises,like the McKenzie extension-program and behavioral posture changes,have been shown to improve LBP by causing anterior migration of disc tissue.Similar results may be a

27、chieved by yoga or tai-chi extension-based excersises.Flexion movements,however,may lead to posterior disc mifration and further aggravate LDH-related pain.9 The effect of physical therapy on radicular pain remains controversial.3.3.2.Traction therapy As a part of a physical therapy program,traction

28、 therapyeither manually or with traction devicesaims to reduce the mechanical load of the disc and expand the neural foramina.Most case series and meta-analyses,however,indicate that traction only temporarily improves LBP or radicular pain and poses serious risks including traction-induced nerve inj

29、ury,ligament tears,or vertebral fractures.Traction does not appear to have a beneficial effect on spinal mobility.10 3.3.3.Bed rest Limiting all physcial activity for more than two days is defined as“bed rest”.In a retrospective cohort of 23 patients with LDH,Altun et al reported that 2 weeks of bed

30、 rest reduced low back pain due to LDH.11 In their meta-analysis of 49 studies,however,Jordon et al found that bed rest may be no more effective than watching waiting at improving pain scores at 12 weeks in patients with sciatica.12 3.3.4.Traditional medicine Traditional medicine like accupuncture a

31、nd cupping therapy have been practiced for over 2000 years in China,India,and the Middle East and are becoming more popular in the western world.Although there are a handful of low-quality studies supporting the benefits of traditional medicine,a large meta-analyis published in 2005 stated that accu

32、-puncture may provide immediate or short-term relief of chronic LBP,but there is insufficient high-quality evidence showing a positive effect on discogenic pain.13 Table 1 Summary of the reviewed papers.No Study Evidence Level Number of patients Main target Conclusions 1 Zhang B.et al,2017 1 Metaana

33、lysis of 80 papers Evaluation of the effect of non-surgical therapy(Chinese traditional medicine,pharmacotherapy and physical therapy)on lumbar disc hernia Non-surgical therapy has favorable outcomes in patients with lumbar disc hernia;traditional Chinese medicine(manual therapy,accupuncture etc)is

34、favorable of having less side effects than pharmacotherapy 2 Boyraz I.et al,2015 3 65 Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and ultrasound treatment in patients with lumbar discopathy HILT and US treatment are effective in lumbar discopathy and had longer positive outcomes compared to pharmacot

35、herapy only 3 Paul CP.et al,2017 2 125 Evalutation of static axial loading on intervertebral disc space in a goat biomechanical model Concurrent static axial loading results in the posterolateral part of the intervertebral disc 4 Altun I.et al,2017 3 23 Investigation of effect of bed rest on lumbar

36、disc hernia Bed rest positively reacts on lumbar disc hernia-induced pain in combination with pain therapy 5 Kreiner DS.et al,2014 1 Review based on 29 clinical questions What is the likihood that a patient with lumbar disc herniation and radiculopath undergoing medical treatment would have good/exc

37、ellent functional outcomes at short,medium and long term?Medical treatment is suggested to improve functional outcomes in most patients with lumbar disc herniation and radiculopathy 6 Kaye AD.et al,2021 1 Review of 21 trials Comparision of the different administration routes of epidural injections E

38、pidural injections with local anesthetic and steroid showed level I evidence for transforaminal and interlaminar approaches;local anesthesia alone was noted as level II evidence;Caudal injections with local anestehsia or steroids showed level II efficacy 7 Jordan JL.et al,2011 1 37 reviews Investiga

39、te the effect of epidural steroid injections on lumbar disc hernia Epidural steroid injections are shown to improve limb pain and increasing patients satisfactions at 2 weeks but show no effect after 2 weeks 8 Chiu CC.et al,2015 1 31 articles Evaluation of possibility of spontaneous regression of lu

40、mbar disc hernia Spontaneous regression of herniated lumbar disc may result in 6090%of patients 9 Hu D.et al,2020 3 31 Comparision of 12 and 24-month follow-up of patients receving conservative treatment and minimally-invasive percutaneous discectomy for lumbar disc herniation Patients who underwent

41、 percutaneous discectomy had significantly better VAS scores than the ones who received conservative therapy 10 Demirel A.et al,2017 3 29 Does non-invasive spinal decompression physical therapy effect the reabsorption of lumbar disc hernia?Extension exercises reduce stress on the lumbar disc,wheras

42、constant flexion movements may increase it 11 Gastaldi R.et al,2019 2 54 Comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methyprednisolone with placebo in sicatica NSAIDs are effective for short-time symptomatic treatment of LBP;A higher propotion of patients relieved with intravenou

43、s methyprednisolone at day 3 12 Noble M.et al,2018 1 4893 Evaluation the effectiveness of opiods on non-cancer pain Despite significant relieve of pain,up to 23%patients showed serious adverse effects and discontinued opioid treatment.Improvement of quality of life were inconclusive O.Yaman et al.Wo

44、rld Neurosurgery:X 22(2024)10027743.3.5.Injections Administration of local anesthesia,corticosteroids,or a mixture of both through the sacral hiatus,interlaminar space,neural foramen,or facet capsule has been widely performed for the non-surgical treatment of LDH.These injected agents are believed t

45、o reduce the inflammatory response of the herniated disc and reduce edema,thereby decreasing neural compression.Althogh injection therapies,are beneficial in selected LDH patients,long-term outcomes are worse than surgical outcomes,particularly when focusing on radicular pain.They can be useful in p

46、atients with significant comorbidities who are not suitable surgical candidates or in patients who wish to avoid surgical interven-tion.However,reports indicate that a high portion of patients under-going injection therapy may still end up requiring surgery in the long-term.14 3.3.6.Intradiscal inte

47、rventions The majority of herniatied discs are filled with water.As a result,intradiscal interventions like nucleoplasty with lasers or radiofrequency via a temperature-controlled resistive heating coil are believed to work by evaporating the water content of the disc tissue,thereby reducing the her

48、niated mass with thermal energy and also denervating the annulus.Reports show short-term improvement in LBP and radiculopathy,but there is insufficient evidence that intradiscal therapies provide long-term benefit in the treatment of LDH-associated pain,and many pa-tients may still require surgery i

49、n the future.15 3.3.7.WFNS spine committee recommendations Following two rounds of voting in the international consensus meetings,the WFNS Spine Committee produced the following recom-mendatons on the conservative treatment of lumbar disc herniations:1)NSAIDs have significant positive effect on impr

50、oving acute low back and sciatic pain caused by LDH 2)Conservative treatment is recommended as the first-line treatment for LDH in patients who do not have neurologic deficits such as motor deficits or cauda equina syndrome.4.Conclusion LDH-related low back pain and radiculopathy represents one of t

移动网页_全站_页脚广告1

关于我们      便捷服务       自信AI       AI导航        获赠5币

©2010-2024 宁波自信网络信息技术有限公司  版权所有

客服电话:4008-655-100  投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100

gongan.png浙公网安备33021202000488号   

icp.png浙ICP备2021020529号-1  |  浙B2-20240490  

关注我们 :gzh.png    weibo.png    LOFTER.png 

客服