2017托福写作真题分析与范文.docx

2017托福写作真题分析与范文 Linda4.15 / 2.252017 年01月07日 托福写作考题回忆综合防止海龟减少的办法是否有用阅读：有3种办法防止海龟减少1建立金属围栏，防止海龟蛋被素食者吃掉2禁用塑料袋，海龟吃了塑料袋，消化道会被堵塞3把传统渔网改成只能捕鱼而不会限制海龟的，海龟被渔网捉住，会溺水 听力：上述办法都不行1. 金属围栏会阻碍小海龟的磁场发育，海龟靠磁场导航，找食物，找配偶，找地方产卵。没有发育好的磁场，海龟根本无法生存，繁衍。2. 限制塑料袋或许有用。问题是，现在海里已经有成千上万的塑料袋了，即使分解成了小片，一样会危害海龟。所以限塑解决不了燃眉之急。3. 改进的渔网，渔民会拒绝使用，因为网到的鱼会减少，收入会减少。即使有法律规定必须使用，渔民也会趁没人使用传统渔网，回到岸上再换成改进渔网。Sample Answer:When it comes to the decrease of sea turtles population, the reading puts forward three solutions to prevent this tendency. However, all these three solutions are regarded as invalid in the listening. First, the idea that building a metal fence will work. Not as it puts in the reading, the listening argues that the mental fence will hinder the development of magnetic field which exerts influence on the growth of the little sea turtles. The listening further illustrates that sea turtles rely on magnetic field to navigate, find food and mates as well as find a suitable place to lay eggs. Without a fully developed magnetic field, they cannot live and reproduce. As to the second measure of a ban of the plastic bags, the listening still refutes it. As a matter of fact, there are already thousands of plastic bags in the sea, which, although decomposing into small pieces, still pose great threat to sea turtles. Therefore, the ban of plastic bags is not the point. Lastly, the reading calls on to transform the traditional fishing nets into those catching only fish but not sea turtles. Unfortunately, the third solution is not able to work well. The listening explains that the fishermen will refuse to use the transformed fishing nets for they will catch fewer fish and thus get a decreased income. Even though relevant laws are enacted, the fishermen will apply the traditional fishing nets before replacing them with the transformed fishing nets on shore. （247 words） 独立You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a persons honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader?Sample Answer:Regardless of the increasingly complicated relationships among modern people, honesty is still regarded as the most cherished characteristic when it comes to evaluating others around us. Therefore, it is not beyond our expectation that someone gives priority to honesty when selecting a leader for a student organization. According to my preference and experience, there are other two factors that are more worth noticing. To begin with, the ability to plan and organize is the most essential characteristic for a student leader for the sake of a smooth progress of the student affairs. In other words, competent leaders are those with detailed plans and clear goals in their mind. Otherwise, the whole group will easily get lost on the way and lose the impetus to strive for their common goals. By making a detailed plan and carrying it out step by step, a group leader is not only capable of pushing forward and complete the preset projects but also able to keep the team members away from distrust and anxiety. For example, if a leader of English Association is going to conduct an English speaking contest, he is required to figure out the concrete process of a speaking contest, the cost related to the applied facilities as well as the assignment for each individual in the group. Besides, whether the candidate for the student leader masters the art of communication is also worth noticing. It is no denying that the leader of a student organization is exposed to various chances to interact with group members encompassing students of distinct personality traits. Therefore，it is of paramount importance for the leader to be possessed with the ability to relate well with others. More importantly, only by well coordinating the relations among the team members can the student leader be capable of ensuring the smooth progress of the organization. To illustrate, if conflicts arise among team members during the process of crucial projects, the leader has the obligation to properly settle the disagreement by skillfully calming them down with maybe witty words and then take measures to cope with the problems. Admittedly, it is indisputable that honesty should not be neglected in terms of choosing a leader. After all, honesty has a lot to do with obtaining trust and creating a harmonious atmosphere among the whole group. It is natural that people usually rely on an honest person without reservation. Nevertheless, it is still not wise enough to regard it as the most crucial factor in terms of choosing a leader for student organizations for honesty does not testify to ones ability and competence in dealing with group projects. To sum up, taking the ability of planning and organizing as well as communication skills into consideration, it is too rash to put honesty first when choosing a leader for student organizations. (469words)2017 年01月14日 托福写作考题回忆综合Whether the three methods to stop snakeheads from spreading is feasible.Reading：The reading raises three methods to stop the spread of snakehead fish because it threatens the ecosystem.1. Making laws to prevent people from transporting snakehead fish. Some people in the fish market will illegally transport or release unsold snakehead fish.2. Educating fishers to catch snakehead. If they recognize that people actually can eat snakehead as a food source, they will catch many to eat and to sell.3. Researching some poison to kill the snakehead. Though poison will also kill native fishes in the river, people can restock native fishes.Listening:The listening contradicts all methods proposed by the author of the passage and points out their potential problems.1. Even if people do not transport the snakehead, the spread will still continue. The reason is that there are already many snakeheads, and these snakeheads will move to other rivers even without humans efforts, because they can live and move on land as long as they are moist.2. Educating fishers to catch snakehead will not help stop the spread of snakehead. Conversely, it may lead to the increase of snakehead. Because when fishers realize they can make profit by catching snakehead, they will introduce snakehead to other water bodies and raise snakehead in order to catch more snakehead, even this is illegal.3. It is true that native fishes can be restocked; however, poison will also kill some insects and micro organisms, which cannot be restocked. So, native fishes that feed on these insects and micro organisms cannot grow to their original size. This is irreversible.Sample Answer:The reading passage and lecture both talk about how to stop the spread of snakeheads and the professor contradicts all those method mentioned in the passage respectively. The first solution is to make laws to prevent people from transporting snakehead fish, according to the passage. However the professor gives opposite viewpoint that even if people do not transport the snakeheads, the spread will still continue, because there are already many snakeheads and they will move to other rivers by moving on land as long as they are moist. In other words, whether people transport them or not, they will still establish their population. Secondly, the professor fights against to teach fishers to catch snakeheads. Actually, when fishers realized that they can make profit by this way, they will introduce snakehead to other water bodies and raise them in order to catch more, which may conversely lead to the increase of snakehead. As to the virus, professor also shows his strong disapproval. Even though the native fishes can be restocked, the poison will kill some insects and micro organisms, which cannot be restocked. Then there comes to an irreversible consequence that the native fishes, which feed on these insects and micro organisms, cannot grow to their original size.(207 words) 独立As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters, the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: 1、Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their majors of study ( For example, a student majoring in engineering may take course in fine arts or social science.) 2、Students must volunteer to work in the universitys city or their hometowns to improve some aspects of life of the city or their own town.( For example, students may help local primary school children with their homework.)Which one do you think is more beneficial for students in their university? Why?Given detailed examples and reasons. Use your OWN words, do NOT use memorized examples.Sample Answer:There is large quantity of students who spend their spare time to do volunteer work mainly as a consequence of the requirement of credit or some working experience. Still, that totally makes no sense. Even though I am not a university students now, given the choice, I would choose to learn some knowledge that different from my own major. Wide range of social circle is the first benefit when they learn various subjects. All what we do in the society like starting a business and fulfill the ambition in career depend on abundant social resources. The social circle, which provides the greatest help in promoting our work and life, needs to be set up when we are in the university. Various classes are exactly the way that create chances for us to meet friends in various fields. On the contrary, if restricted in own world, we get along with small range of friends who share the same skills and knowledge. When we meet some trouble in future career, its merely impossible to cooperate with them. For the sake of future development, making friends through this way is a great opportunity to expand our pool of companions. Aside from making friends who are separate from our core social circle, another advantage is that what we learn in other fields may have great contributions to our original major. There is no such subject that can establish without any other field. I am a sociological students, who were asked to learn some statistics that seems irrelevant but actually, help me a lot when I do some social researches. I might not finish my thesis before graduation if the professor had not ask us to take statistics courses. I really dont see anything wrong with the students taking the courses that have no connection with their major whether they are truly interested in it or just for the sake of annual paper or examinations. Two years ago, I interviewed some of those students why they took volunteer work in holidays, I found the leading reason was that they wanted to accumulate working experiences. It sounds reasonable but actually, most students apply for the job that is far away from what they did voluntarily before. According to a recent survey conducted by my professor, who is a specialist in research of employment, no more than 7% involved students choose their final job as what their social practice did and most of them have totally different ideas from their original thoughts when they were in campus. Since the working experience from volunteer has no business to their final career, what is the rationale behind this choice? There is nothing wrong with doing volunteer work in holiday. For the best future development, though, learning different knowledge and skills is the better way to enrich our life. (469 words)2017 年01月14日 托福写作考题回忆综合Whether the three methods to stop snakeheads from spreading is feasible.Reading：The reading raises three methods to stop the spread of snakehead fish because it threatens the ecosystem.1. Making laws to prevent people from transporting snakehead fish. Some people in the fish market will illegally transport or release unsold snakehead fish.2. Educating fishers to catch snakehead. If they recognize that people actually can eat snakehead as a food source, they will catch many to eat and to sell.3. Researching some poison to kill the snakehead. Though poison will also kill native fishes in the river, people can restock native fishes. Listening:The listening contradicts all methods proposed by the author of the passage and points out their potential problems.1. Even if people do not transport the snakehead, the spread will still continue. The reason is that there are already many snakeheads, and these snakeheads will move to other rivers even without humans efforts, because they can live and move on land as long as they are moist.2. Educating fishers to catch snakehead will not help stop the spread of snakehead. Conversely, it may lead to the increase of snakehead. Because when fishers realize they can make profit by catching snakehead, they will introduce snakehead to other water bodies and raise snakehead in order to catch more snakehead, even this is illegal.3. It is true that native fishes can be restocked; however, poison will also kill some insects and micro organisms, which cannot be restocked. So, native fishes that feed on these insects and micro organisms cannot grow to their original size. This is irreversible.Sample Answer:The reading passage and lecture both talk about how to stop the spread of snakeheads and the professor contradicts all those method mentioned in the passage respectively. The first solution is to make laws to prevent people from transporting snakehead fish, according to the passage. However the professor gives opposite viewpoint that even if people do not transport the snakeheads, the spread will still continue, because there are already many snakeheads and they will move to other rivers by moving on land as long as they are moist. In other words, whether people transport them or not, they will still establish their population. Secondly, the professor fights against to teach fishers to catch snakeheads. Actually, when fishers realized that they can make profit by this way, they will introduce snakehead to other water bodies and raise them in order to catch more, which may conversely lead to the increase of snakehead. As to the virus, professor also shows his strong disapproval. Even though the native fishes can be restocked, the poison will kill some insects and micro organisms, which cannot be restocked. Then there comes to an irreversible consequence that the native fishes, which f