ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:56 ,大小:3.36MB ,
资源ID:2458035      下载积分:14 金币
验证码下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
验证码: 获取验证码
温馨提示:
支付成功后,系统会自动生成账号(用户名为邮箱或者手机号,密码是验证码),方便下次登录下载和查询订单;
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

开通VIP
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.zixin.com.cn/docdown/2458035.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载【60天内】不扣币)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  
声明  |  会员权益     获赠5币     写作写作

1、填表:    下载求助     留言反馈    退款申请
2、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
3、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,个别因单元格分列造成显示页码不一将协商解决,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
4、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
5、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前自行私信或留言给上传者【天****】。
6、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
7、本文档遇到问题,请及时私信或留言给本站上传会员【天****】,需本站解决可联系【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【 服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【 版权申诉】”(推荐),意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:4008-655-100;投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100。

注意事项

本文(骨盆骨折-读书报告.ppt)为本站上传会员【天****】主动上传,咨信网仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知咨信网(发送邮件至1219186828@qq.com、拔打电话4008-655-100或【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】),核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载【60天内】不扣币。 服务填表

骨盆骨折-读书报告.ppt

1、Reading Report Pelvic Ring Fracture2024/5/27 周一1.Article 12024/5/27 周一2.Isolated Injury of the Acetabulum and Pelvic RinglHistorically,pelvic ring disruptions were classified based on anatomic location(Judet),mechanism of injury(Young-Burgess),or stability(Tile).2024/5/27 周一3.Judet Classfication2024

2、/5/27 周一4.Combined Acetabular andPelvic Ring InjurieslThe incidence of combined injury patterns is difficult to assess,but in case series the rate has been reported to be 5%to 15.7%。lIn patients with isolated acetabular fractures,fracture of the posterior wall is common;however,this fracture type is

3、 rare in combined injuries.lCompared with isolated fracture types,combined injuries have a higher incidence of transverse and associated both-column fractures.2024/5/27 周一5.2024/5/27 周一6.Initial Management2024/5/27 周一周一7.Definitive ManagementlDefinitive surgical timing and management of combined inj

4、uries should be performed commensurate with the patients physiology,resuscitation status,and associated injuries.2024/5/27 周一8.lSurgical indications for combined pelvic ring injury and acetabular fractures are similar to those of isolated injuries;only the surgical tactics and logistics may differ.l

5、Indications for surgical management of acetabular injury include an incongruent joint with displacement measuring5 mm,although some recommend fixation when displacement measures2 mm;a hip joint that is either subluxated or unstable;posterior wall fracture with demonstrated hip instability;the presen

6、ce of intra-articular fragments;a roofarc measurement of45 on any AP or Judet view plain radiographs;open injury;progressive neurologic deficit;or an irreducible hip dislocation.Definitive Management2024/5/27 周一9.Definitive Management2024/5/27 周一10.Definitive Management2024/5/27 周一11.2024/5/27 周一12.

7、SummarylAn orthopaedic surgeon should be intimately involved early to help guide treatment strategies.lOnce the patient is stabilized,attention can be turned to definitive management of the combined injury,which requires meticulous identification and thorough understanding of both the pelvic ring an

8、d acetabular fractures.lThese injuries should be assessed separately,and the overall treatment strategy should integrate the independent assessments of the pelvic ring and acetabular fractureslThe surgeon should strive to achieve anatomic reduction of both the acetabulum and the pelvic ring.2024/5/2

9、7 周一13.Article 22024/5/27 周一14.METHODSlWe identified 109 patients treated at a Level I trauma centre between 1973 and 1990 with multiple blunt orthopaedic injuries including an injury to the pelvic ring,with an Injury Severity Score(ISS)of 16.lThese patients were invited for clinical review at a min

10、imum of ten years after the initial injury,at which point functional results,general health scores and socioeconomic factors were assessed.2024/5/27 周一15.METHODSlIn all 33 isolated anterior(group A),33 isolated posterior(group P)and 43 combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries(group A/P)were

11、included.The mean age of the patients at injury was 28.8 years(5 to 55)and the mean ISS was 22.7(16 to 44)lThe Short Form(SF)-12 survey was used to assess the quality of life.lThe Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome(HASPOC)was used to classify the rehabilitation of severely injured patients.2024/5

12、/27 周一16.METHODS2024/5/27 周一17.Results2024/5/27 周一18.Results2024/5/27 周一19.Results2024/5/27 周一20.Results2024/5/27 周一21.ResultslAt review the mean Short-Form 12 physical component score for the A/P group was 38.71(22.12 to 56.56)and the mean Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome subjective score was

13、67.27(12.48 to 147.42),being significantly worse compared with the other two groups(p=0.004 and p=0.024,respectively).lA total of 42 patients(39%)had a limp and 12(11%)required crutches.lCar or public transport usage was restricted in 16 patients(15%).lOverall patients in groups P and A/P had a wors

14、e outcome.2024/5/27 周一22.DiscussionlPosterior and combined anterior/posterior injuries had a worse outcome than isolated anterior injuries.lA higher proportion of patients in group A required analgesia.2024/5/27 周一23.Article 32024/5/27 周一24.lEmergency devices for pelvic ring stabilization include ci

15、rcumferential sheets,pelvic binders,and c-clamps.lOur knowledge of the outcome of these techniques is currently based on limited information.Background2024/5/27 周一25.lTwo hundred seven of 6137 (3.4%)patients documented in the German Pelvic Trauma Registry between April 30th 2004 and January 19th 201

16、2 were treated by sheets,binders,or c-clamps.lMost of the participating institutions (listed in the Acknowledgements)fulfilled the requirements of a Level I trauma centre according to the classification of the American College of Surgery and the German Trauma SocietylImages included pelvic X-rays an

17、d,depending on the fracture type and medical condition of the patient,additional CT scans,and in a substantial number of cases additional autopsyMETHODS2024/5/27 周一26.lAfter checking normality of distributions and equal variance,the differences in age group proportions,sex,fracture type,mortality,as

18、 well as incidence of complex fractures,pelvic packing,arterial embolization,and lethal pelvic bleeding between patients treated by sheets,binders,and c-clamps were analysed using chi-square test.lDifferences in numerical age,time between admission and procedure,systolic arterial blood pressure,Inju

19、ry Severity Score (ISS),number of packed red blood cells transfused during the first 6h after admission,and time of hospitalisation were evaluated using the KruskalWallis test.lDifferences in blood haemoglobin concentration were analysed by one-way ANOVA.METHODS2024/5/27 周一27.lAs the main outcome me

20、asure,the overall mortality was considered.For the analysis of predictors for patient mortality a multivariate logistic regression model was built.lFollowing demographic and clinical characteristics were documented in the registry and considered as relevant adjustment factors for the present analysi

21、s.METHODS2024/5/27 周一28.ResultslMost patients were treated by c-clamps (133 of 192 patients;69%),followed by sheets (31 of 192 patients;16%),and binders(28 of 192 patients;15%).lThe fraction of females was 16%(5 of 31 patients)in the sheet,36%(10 of 28 patients)in the binder,and 35%(46 of 133 patien

22、ts)in the c-clamp group(p=0.12).2024/5/27 周一29.ResultslThe median age was significantly lower in patients treated with binders than in patients treated with sheets or c-clamps (26 vs.47 vs.42 years,p=0.01).Accordingly,the fraction of individuals under 40 years of age was significantly higher in the

23、binder group than in the sheet and c-clamp groups.2024/5/27 周一30.Results2024/5/27 周一31.Results2024/5/27 周一32.Results2024/5/27 周一33.ResultslSheet wrapping was associated with a significantly higher incidence of lethal bleeding from the pelvic region compared to binder and c-clamp stabilization.2024/5

24、/27 周一34.Results2024/5/27 周一35.lMultivariate logistic regression model showed 4 significant predictors for patient mortality.lPatients with higher age (Odds Ratio (OR)for each additional age year 1.05;CI 95%1.031.08;p 0.001),with additional packing (OR yes vs.no 3.24;CI 95%1.407.46;p =0.01),with hig

25、her ISS (OR for each additional ISS point 1.04;CI 95%1.011.07;p =0.01)and emergency stabilization measure (OR sheet wrapping vs.c-clamp 3.26;CI 95%1.159.26;p =0.03)had a higher likelihood for passing away in the sample.Results2024/5/27 周一36.lMeasurement of blood haemoglobin and arterial blood pressu

26、re at admission as well as fracture patterns and ISS were comparable between patients treated by sheets,binders,and c-clamps.This suggests that the outcome of these measures was not affected by the pattern and severity of injuries.lThis finding might indicate that sheets and binders were mostly used

27、 in the emergency room,while c-clamps were applied more often in the safer environment of the operation theatre.l Sheet wrapping and pelvic binders can also be applied in the pre-hospital courseConclusions2024/5/27 周一37.ConclusionslWe assume that the influence of additional packing was not causal fo

28、r the lethal outcome,but rather reflected the severity of injury,whereas sheet wrapping might have been indeed in several cases not effective to control pelvic haemorrhage.lOur data suggest that emergency stabilization of the pelvic ring by c-clamps in younger patients with lower ISS is associated w

29、ith less mortality.lUnadjusted analyses showed a lower rate of lethal pelvic bleeding for binders and c-clamps in comparison with sheet wrapping.lCircumferential sheets and binders seem to be,however,faster applicable than the c-clamp.2024/5/27 周一38.Article 42024/5/27 周一39.IntroductionlThe potential

30、 associated chronic complications in this special group include chronic pain,gait impairment,and sexual and urinary dysfunction.lThe urogenital system(bladder,urethra,vagina,uterus,and prostate)and lumbar and sacral plexuses because of their proximity to the bony pelvis are often concomitantly damag

31、ed at the time of pelvic fracture.lAlthough these injuries have been identified as one of the basic factors of late morbidity and complications,their late sequel,especially regarding sexual function,has not been investigated in adequate detail.2024/5/27 周一40.ObjectiveslTo provide evidence on the mid

32、term sexual-function and health-related quality-of-life outcome of patients with a traumatic pelvic fracture,as recorded at least 12 months after their surgery.2024/5/27 周一41.PATIENTS AND METHODSlPatients aged 18 65 years at the time of their accident and at least 1 year after treatment for a pelvic

33、 fracture were considered eligible to participate in this study.lSubjects were excluded if they had urogenital associated pathology before the accident or other clinical conditions that would preclude participation in the trial or potentially interfere with ambulation or rehabilitation.2024/5/27 周一4

34、2.lA proforma was used to collect the following data:demographics,injury mechanism,fracture pattern classified using the Young et al pelvic fracture classification system,ISS associated injuries and treatment method.lThe international index of erectile function(IIEF)and the female sexual function in

35、dex(FSFI)were used to assess sexual function in men and women,respectively,and the European EuroQol(EQ5D)was used to assess their health-related quality of life.PATIENTS AND METHODS2024/5/27 周一43.Results2024/5/27 周一44.Results2024/5/27 周一45.Results2024/5/27 周一46.Results2024/5/27 周一47.Results2024/5/27

36、 周一48.ResultslSexual dysfunction was identified in 43.8%of the female and 52.1%of the male patients2024/5/27 周一49.Results2024/5/27 周一50.Results2024/5/27 周一51.ResultslUrinary tract injury and open reduction internal fixation of the pelvic fractures were show n to be significant risk factors for sexua

37、l dysfunction as de fined by the FSFI and IIEF(P,0.049 and P,0.016,respectively).The ISS showed a n ear significant relations hip with sexual dysfunction(P,0.05).2024/5/27 周一52.DiscussionlAll domains of female and male sexual function were significantly decreased at a minimum of a year after pelvic

38、fracture.lQuality of life was also significantly decreased in this group with sexual dysfunction shown to be an independent risk factor for decreased quality of life after injury.lHigh clinical suspicion and prompt engagement of appropriate multidisciplinary pathways,including urological,gynecological,and psychiatric consultations,is recommended.2024/5/27 周一53.2024/5/27 周一54.2024/5/27 周一55.5/27/202456.

移动网页_全站_页脚广告1

关于我们      便捷服务       自信AI       AI导航        获赠5币

©2010-2024 宁波自信网络信息技术有限公司  版权所有

客服电话:4008-655-100  投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100

gongan.png浙公网安备33021202000488号   

icp.png浙ICP备2021020529号-1  |  浙B2-20240490  

关注我们 :gzh.png    weibo.png    LOFTER.png 

客服