ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:93 ,大小:2.20MB ,
资源ID:13177238      下载积分:10 金币
快捷注册下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

开通VIP
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.zixin.com.cn/docdown/13177238.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载【60天内】不扣币)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

开通VIP折扣优惠下载文档

            查看会员权益                  [ 下载后找不到文档?]

填表反馈(24小时):  下载求助     关注领币    退款申请

开具发票请登录PC端进行申请

   平台协调中心        【在线客服】        免费申请共赢上传

权利声明

1、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
2、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,个别因单元格分列造成显示页码不一将协商解决,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
3、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
4、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前可先查看【教您几个在下载文档中可以更好的避免被坑】。
5、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
6、文档遇到问题,请及时联系平台进行协调解决,联系【微信客服】、【QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【版权申诉】”,意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:0574-28810668;投诉电话:18658249818。

注意事项

本文(异基因造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤.ppt)为本站上传会员【pc****0】主动上传,咨信网仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知咨信网(发送邮件至1219186828@qq.com、拔打电话4009-655-100或【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】),核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载【60天内】不扣币。 服务填表

异基因造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤.ppt

1、单击此处编辑母版标题样式,单击此处编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,*,Allogeneic,haematopoietic,cell transplantation for multiple,myeloma,The,allogeneic,transplant has the advantage over the,autologous,transplant,The graft does not contain tumor cells and the potential for a graft versus,myeloma,(,GvM,)effect,Bone marrow tra

2、nsplantation in three patients with multiple,myeloma,Gahrton,G,Ringdn,O,Lnnqvist,B,Lindquist R,Ljungman,P,.,Acta,Med Scand 1986;219(5):523-7.,瑞典卡罗林斯卡医学院,1983,Myeloablative,conditioning,Three patients with multiple,myeloma,received bone marrow grafts from HLA-identical sibling donors,One of the patie

3、nts,with,IgA,kappa,myeloma,refractory to,alkeran,-prednisone therapy,is well and still without sign of disease 26 months post transplantation,A second patient with,Bence,-Jones kappa,myeloma,is well,and skeletal pain and,Bence,-Jones,proteinuria,has disappeared 2 months after transplantation.,A thir

4、d patient with,IgG,-lambda,myeloma,died of effusive,pericarditis,shortly after transplantation.,Acta,Med Scand 1986;219(5):523-7,Conclusion,Bone marrow transplantation may be indicated in a selective group of patients with multiple,myeloma,Acta,Med Scand 1986;219(5):523-7,Out of 690,allogenetic,matc

5、hed sibling donor transplants for MM,344 were performed during the period 1983-93(all with BM)group 1,356 during 1994-98(223 with BM group 2 and 133 with PB group 3),the median age at transplantation of patients in group 1 was 43 years(range 21-62),In group 2,44 years(range 18_57)and in group 3,46 y

6、ears(range 25_60),TBI+CY tended to be more commonly used in group 1(37%)and 2(39%)than in group 3(27%),Melphalan,containing regimes tended to be,morely,used in group 3,Melphalan,or,Busulphan,+CY rarely,Conditiong,regime,Engraftment,GVHD,Treatment related mortality,Treatment related mortality,Relapse

7、 rate,Relapse rate,Survival,Survival,Progression free survival,PFS was significantly better for group 2than for group 1(P,0.0001),With no significantly difference between group 2 and 3,Cause of death,75%in group 1,36%in group 2,33%in group 3,GVHD,Fungal,ARDS,Organ failure,Cause of death,the study sh

8、ows that the improvement is entirely a result of a lower TRM during the latest 5-years period,aGVHD,has no changed during this,peroid,There was significant difference in deaths caused by IP and bacterial and,fungalinfection,Conditioning regime,TBI+Melphalan,has not,previrous,been,Shown to be superio

9、r to TBI+CY in this study,conclusion,Survival,3060%,Treatment related mortality,30%,Myeloablative,allogeneic,versus,autologous,transplantation,during the years 1983 to 1994,189,myeloma,patients who underwent,allo,-BMT with an HLA-identical sibling donor were compared retrospectively with an equal nu

10、mber of patients who received,a single,autologous,bone marrow or blood stem cell graft,And the ASCT patients were transplanted from 1986 to 1994,conclusion,The overall survival was significantly better for ASCT than for,allo,-BMT,with a median survival of 34 months and 18 months,respectively,(P,=.00

11、1),The main reason for the poorer survival in,allo,-BMT patients was higher TRM (41%,v,13%for ASCT,P,=.0001),which was not compensated for by a lower rate of relapse and progression,conclusion,However,in patients alive at 1 year,posttransplant,there was a trend for better long-term survival,(P,=.O9)

12、and significantly better progression-free survival,(P,=.02)for,allo,-BMT as compared with ASCT,We conclude that the median survival is superior for ASCT,However,allo,-BMT has a lower relapse rate,which results in a similar long-term outcome for both approaches,but a longer follow-up is needed to ass

13、ess the final outcome,Reduced-intensity conditioning,allogeneic,transplantation,The,Allo,-RIC was introduced in an attempt to decrease the transplant-related toxicity while retaining the beneficial,GvM,effect,1998 begin clinical study,19982003,We report the outcome of 229 patients,who received an al

14、lograft for,myeloma,with reduced-intensity conditioning(RIC),regimens from 33 centers within the EBMT.,With a median follow-up of 28 months,115 patients are,alive(range,1-53 months),The estimated overall survival at 3 years,is 40.6%(CI,33%-49%),The treatment-related mortalities at day 100,1,year,and

15、2 years were 10%,22%,and 26%,respectively.,The cumulative probability of the progression-free survival was 21.3%(CI,15%-29%)at 3years,Conclusion,While RIC is feasible,heavily pretreated patients and patients with progressive disease do not benefit,RIC,vs,MAC,Data were available on a total of 516 pa

16、tients from 103 centers:320 patients with RIC and 196 with MAC.,between January 1,1998,to December 31,2002,The median follow-up was 28 months,conclusion,RIC was associated with a reduction in TRM,but this was offset by an increase in relapse risk,the conditioning intensity did not impact on overall

17、survival or retain significance for PFS,These data suggest that there is a continuing need to investigate dose intensity in the conditioning for,myeloma,allografts,.,Tandem,autologous/Allo,-RIC transplantation,Autologous,hematopoietic,cell,transplantation(HCT,)followed by,nonmyeloablative,allogeneic

18、HCT(auto/,alloHCT,)provides,cytoreduction,and graft-versus-,myeloma,effects.,弗雷德哈钦森癌症研究中心,Patient inclusion criteria for this analysis were,stage II or III MM at diagnosis,available human leukocyte antigen(HLA)identical sibling donor,programmed sequential treatment with conventional,autologous,HCT

19、followed by,nonmyeloablative,auto/,alloHCT,no prior,autologous,HCT.,105 patients with MM fulfilling those criteria were sequentially enrolled at 10 centers on 4 FHCRC-coordinated,multiinstitutional,protocols from August 1998 to August 2005,Patients proceeded to,allogeneic,HCT 40 to 180 days after,au

20、tografting,Autologous,HCT.,(G-CSF)mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells(G-PBMC)were harvested by,leukapheresis,after treatment with,cyclophosphamide,3 to 4 g/m2(day 1)and G-CSF 10 g/kg subcutaneously(from day 3 through collection),Autologous,HCT,38 patients received additional,paclitaxel,(250

21、 mg/m2 per day,day 2),and 25 received additional,etoposide,(200 mg/m2 per day;days 1,2,3),and,dexamethasone,(10 mg/day orally;days 1,2,3,4),Two patients received G-CSF alone,.,Autologous,HCT,No treatment for MM was given between,autologous,and,allogeneic,HCT,Allogeneic,HCT,After recovery from,autolo

22、gous,HCT,102,patientsproceeded,to,allotransplantation,.Donors were HLA-identical siblings,Nonmyeloablative,conditioning consisted in all patients of 2,Gy,total body irradiation(TBI)at 7,cGy,/min by linear accelerator or cobalt on day 0,27 patients received additional,fludarabine,(30 mg/m2)on days 4,

23、3,and 2,N,%,Engraftment,All 102,allografted,patients had sustained engraftment.,On day 28,medians of 90%,95%,and 95%of peripheral blood T cells,granulocytes,and nucleated marrow,cells,respectively,were of donor origin.,This increased to medians of 96%to 100%on day 84,GVHD,43 patients(42%)developed g

24、rades 2 to 4 acute GVHD at a median of 42(range,8-107)days,74 patients(74%)developed chronic extensive GVHD at a median of 167(range,90-830)days after transplantation,.,NRM,NRM was 1%at day 100 and 11%,14%,and 18%at 1,2,and 5 years after,allografting,respectively,GVHD and infections were responsible

25、 for 18 of 19 non relapse related deaths.,Overall and progression-free survivals,After a median follow-up of 6.3 years after,allografting,(range 2-9),60 of 102(59%)patients survived and 33 of 102(32%)are in remission,Five-year estimated OS and PFS were 64%and 36%,respectively,conclusion,auto/,allo,-

26、RIC HCT is a treatment option for patients with advanced stage MM,The addition of novel agents(,eg,thalidomide,bortezomib,and,lenalidomide,)as induction or,postgrafting,therapy,acting with GVM effects against disease-specific antigens,might further improve the outcome.,improve the outcome,Thalidomid

27、e/,lenalidomide,dexamethasone,Bortezomib,研究所佩奥利,-,Calmettes,,马赛,法国,This was a retrospective study from 3 centers,37 patients treated between November 2003 and March 2007,conclusion,bortezomib,is a safe and efficient option for,myeloma,patients after RIC-,allo,-SCT.,Double autologous,Versus,tandem au

28、to/Allo-RIC transplantation,圣乔凡尼巴蒂斯塔大学医院,都灵,意大利,Methods,All patients were initially treated with VAD followed by,melphalan,and,autologous,stem-cell rescue,Patients with an HLA-identical sibling then received,nonmyeloablative,total-body irradiation and stem cells from the sibling.Patients,without an

29、HLA-identical sibling received two consecutive,myeloablative,doses of,melphalan,each of which was followed by,autologous,stem-cell rescue.,The primary end points were overall survival and event-free survival.,Conclusions,Among patients with newly diagnosed,myeloma,survival in recipients of a,hematop

30、oietic,stem-cell,autograft,followed by a stem-cell allograft from an HLA-identical sibling is superior to that in recipients of tandem stem-cell,autografts,.,UNSOLVED QUESTIONS IN ALLOGENEIC TRANSPLANTATION,Which is the best,allogeneic,transplantation approach?,Who are the patients most likely to benefit from,Allo,-RIC?,How to improve the results of,Allo,-RIC?,

移动网页_全站_页脚广告1

关于我们      便捷服务       自信AI       AI导航        抽奖活动

©2010-2026 宁波自信网络信息技术有限公司  版权所有

客服电话:0574-28810668  投诉电话:18658249818

gongan.png浙公网安备33021202000488号   

icp.png浙ICP备2021020529号-1  |  浙B2-20240490  

关注我们 :微信公众号    抖音    微博    LOFTER 

客服