AWS-项目架构方案PPT学习课件.ppt

单击此处编辑母版标题样式,编辑母版文本样式,第二级,第三级,第四级,第五级,#,Connext China,Guessenger,AWS,项目架构方案,Page,1,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,概要,项目基本介绍,业务需求分析,AWS,需要的组件及相关信息,架构拓扑,AWS,的优势对比传统架构方式（,on premises,）,费用评估,Page,2,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,Guessenger,项目使用社交,APP,软件作为业务主体，业务用户增长迅速,目前用户量,300W,一年后用户增长到,2000W,业务需要资源可自动伸缩功能,大数据分析用户行为,业务有波峰和波谷，合理配置资源，节省资金和避免资源的浪费,业务需要稳定且安全性高的要求,项目基本介绍,Page,3,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,架构设计方案需具有弹性运算和负载均衡、高可用能力的集群环境,在,aws,平台构建基础环境（网络、安全规则和系统实例等）,构建给予,RDS,的数据库集群,安全方面：使用安全软件、负载均衡、防火墙、及应用程序防火墙等，并进行身份识别。,计算资源使用,EC2,、数据库使用,RDS,、,APP,应用服务器基于,PHP,使用,EC2,存储资源使用：,EBS,高,IOPS disk storage,服务高,IO,并发业务系统，,S3,content storage,服务日常存储和备份使用,CDN,在中国,AWS,不支持，因此需要,3rd service,供应商提供,CDN,服务,大数据业务使用,EMR,合规方面使用,CSL-,网络安全法,项目需求分析,Page,4,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,1.,账户管理,IAM,利用,IAM,来实现资源账号的权限管控,2.,网络安全,VPC,通过,VPC,来组网，,NACL,、,Security Group,控制网络和实例安全,3.,存储,S3 EBS Amazon RDS,通过,S3,、,Glacier,、,EBS,的不同存储特性组合满足性能同时实现存储成本最优化,4.,计算,EC2 Auto Scaling ELB,依赖,ELB,实现负载均衡，,AutoScaling,实现弹性扩展，依靠,EC2,群集提供足量的计算资源,AWS,组件,Page,5,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,EC2 14*2C/4G/500G HDD 3*4C/16G/100G SSD 1*4C/16G/1T HDD,EBS 3*100G SSD 14*500G HDD,S3 1T,ELB,*,2,WAF,CDN-cloud front,EMR,CSL-,网络安全法,High Availability,Data Security,Paas service,Devops and CICD tool:ansible&terraform,组件基本信息,Page,6,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,架构拓扑,A,v,ailability Zone,Backups,A,m,a,z,on,S3,Storing static Object and Backups,A,v,ailability Zone,Ela,s,tic,Load Balancing,EC2 Instance:Web Server,RDS DB Instance,Reporting,RDS,DB,In,s,tance Standby,(Mult,i,-,AZ),RDS,DB,In,s,tance Acti,v,e,(Multi,-,AZ),Load,Balancing,WAF,RDS,DBIn,s,tance Standby,(Mult,i,-,AZ),www.,G,A,ma,zon,Route 53,DynamoDB,EMR,No sql,EC2 Instance:Web Server,Auto Scaling Group:Web,Tier,Auto Scaling Group:Web,Tier,Auto Scaling Group:App Tier,Auto Scaling Group:App Tier,EC2 Instance:App Server,EC2 Instance:App Server,Load,Balancing,A,ma,zon Clo,ud,fro,ntRegion,media.,G,VPC Mult,i,-,AZ,Page,7,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,SG,Page,8,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,AWS,优势在哪？,Page,9,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,300W,用户,AWS,费用评估,服务,型号,单价,单位,用量,单位,3,年内预估价,EC2,t2.medium,33.408,$/m,14,台,16837.632,EBS SSD,gp2,30,$/m,3,100G,3240,EBS HDD,Optimized HDD,22.5,$/m,14,500G,11340,S3,Standard,23.56,$/m,1,1T,848.16,ELB,Classic,40.8,$/m,3,个,4406.4,Network out,27.6,$/m,20,T,19872,WAF,350,$/m,1,个,12600,Touted 53,151,$/m,1,套,5436,CloudFront,22.5,$/m,20,T,16200,RDS,db.m4.2xlarge,504,$/m,4,台,72576,DynamoDB,57.6,$/m,1,台,2073.6,EMR,72,$/m,1,套,2592,SES,25.98,$/m,1,套,935.28,ElastiCache,cache.m4.large,112.32,$/m,1,台,4043.52,Kinesis Streams,722.49,$/m,1,套,26009.64,AWS support,131,$/m,1,人,4716,合计,203726.232,Page,10,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,2000W,用户,AWS,费用评估,服务,型号,单价,单位,用量,单位,3,年内预估价,EC2,m4.2xlarge,288,$/m,14,台,145152,EBS SSD,gp2,30,$/m,21,100G,22680,EBS HDD,Optimized HDD,22.5,$/m,98,500G,79380,S3,Standard,23.56,$/m,7,T,5937.12,ELB,Classic,40.8,$/m,3,个,4406.4,Network out,27.6,$/m,100,T,99360,WAF,2520,$/m,1,个,90720,Touted 53,800,$/m,1,套,28800,CloudFront,22.5,$/m,100,T,81000,RDS,db.m4.10 xlarge,2521.44,$/m,4,台,363087.36,DynamoDB,r4.2xlarge,773.28,$/m,1,台,27838.08,EMR,286.56,$/m,1,套,10316.16,SES,25.98,$/m,3,套,2805.84,ElastiCache,cache.m4.4xlarge,896.4,$/m,1,台,32270.4,Kinesis Streams,2000,$/m,1,套,72000,AWS support,826,$/m,1,人,29736,合计,1095489.36,Page,11,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,评估,300W,用户 传统架构使用资源量,#Server,#Cores,RAM(GiB),OS,Storage,Avg.Util.,14,2,4,Linux,14*500GB,100%,4,4,16,Linux,300GB+1T,100%,2000W,用户 传统架构使用资源量,#Server,#Cores,RAM(GiB),OS,Storage,Avg.Util.,14,16,32,Linux,14*3.5T,100%,4,32,128,Linux,2100GB+7T,100%,300W,用户,AWS,使用资源量,Instances,Instance,vCPU,RAM(GiB),Optimize by,Instance Type,14,c3.xlarge,4,7.5,RAM,on demand,4,db.m4.xlarge,4,16,RAM,on demand,2000W,用户,AWS,使用资源量,Instances,Instance,vCPU,RAM(GiB),Optimize by,Instance Type,14,m4.2xlarge,8,32,RAM,on demand,4,db.m4.10 xlarge,40,160,RAM,on demand,AWS,对比,SoftLayer 3,年内架构费用节约约为,3 Years HW Cost Comparation,SoftLayer 300W,SoftLayer 2000W,AWS 300W,AWS 2000W,Server,$129338,$798428,$100,469,$505954,Storage,$63449,$135890,$3,966,$39469,Network,$16977,$74573,$-,$,IT Labor,$,$,$-,$,Total,$209,765,$1008891,$104,435,$545423,300W,用户量可节约,51%,资金,2000W,用户量可节约,56%,资金,注释：此处对比数据并未列出人力成本，可以明确指出,AWS,使用人力成本不足传统架构人力的,10%-20%,，故此,AWS,还会更加节约资金使业务开展更经济更实惠！,另外，预付费方式会比按需付费方式节省,20-30%,的折扣费用。因此合理的架构模式会更经济。,Page,12,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,评估,Page,13,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,Connext China,Welcome,谢谢观看,Page,14,IT SYSTEMS HOSTING INVESTIGATION BBF-42 Sep.29th 2012,