收藏 分销(赏)

室内覆盖设计.doc

上传人:pc****0 文档编号:7440593 上传时间:2025-01-04 格式:DOC 页数:8 大小:126KB 下载积分:10 金币
下载 相关 举报
室内覆盖设计.doc_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
室内覆盖设计.doc_第2页
第2页 / 共8页


点击查看更多>>
资源描述
1.1. Indoor Coverage Why should indoor solutions be used? · cellular competition moves indoors · subscribers expect continuous coverage and quality · outdoor cells do not provide sufficient coverage indoors The benefits of indoor solutions are pointed out in the following picture: 1.1.1. Building Losses Mobile networks are increasingly expected to provide coverage also within buildings. This, however, can rarely be modelled with a prediction tool, since a prediction would require a very detailed database of buildings. This would include locations, window orientations, building materials etc. Therefore signal levels in buildings are estimated by applying an empirically measured “building penetration loss” margin. Typical values are 15..25 dB. This varies from country to country with typical architecture and building materials used. Signal levels within the same building are not constant. There are big differences between locations near an outside window and “deep indoor” situations, e.g. in hallways. 1.1.2. Building Penetration Loss Signal levels in buildings are estimated by applying a “building penetration loss” margin. Big differences between rooms with windows and “deep indoor” exist (10 ..15 dB). Signal losses for building penetration vary greatly with building materials used, e.g.: mean value sigma reinforced concrete wall, windows 17 dB 9 concrete wall, no windows 30 dB 9 concrete wall within building 10 dB 7 brick wall 9 dB 6 armed glass 8 dB 6 wood or plaster wall 6 dB 6 window glass 2 dB 6 No major differences exist for 900 and 1800 MHz. Total building loss = add median values superimpose standard deviations add (lognormal) margin for higher probabilities 1.1.3. Incident Angle Penetration loss depends heavily on incident angle of the radio wave. E.g. measured values for armed glass at 1800 MHz (typical facade of office building): 1.1.4. In-building Path Loss 1.1.5. Indoor Coverage Solutions Indoor coverage solutions include the following features: · Small BTS mini BTS PrimeSite · Repeaters active, passive optical · Antennas distributed antennas radiating cable · Signal distribution power splitters optical fiber 1.1.6. Summary of Indoor Solutions 1.1.7. Radiating Cable · Coaxial cable with perforated leads ==> “energy leak” · Radiating losses 10 ..40 dB per 100m · Coupling loss typically 55 dB (at 1m reference distance) · Produces constant field strengths along cable runs · Operates in wide frequency range · Radiating losses become higher with frequency · Very large bending radii · Bending disturbs field distribution · Formerly often used for tunnel coverage · VERY EXPENSIVE 1.1.8. Indoor Coverage Examples · With repeater relay outdoor signal into target building needs “donor” cell; adds coverage, no capacity · With indoor BTS and distributed antennas heavy losses by power splitting and cabling 1.1.9. Optical Repeater · Signal from in-building BTS · Fiberoptic distribution system very low cabling losses (2 dB/ 1000m) >50 remote antennas possible signal amplification and distribution at remote end easy cabling (very thin fibers) · Application examples multi-level offices, shops airport halls (large distances!) industrial plants 1.1.10. Repeater · Passive repeater needs strong external signal useful only with very short cables seldomly used · Active repeater amplifies and re-transmits all received signals · Wideband or narrowband repeater · Application examples places with coverage need and little traffic remote valleys tunnels underground coverage (e.g. garages) 1.1.11. The “Lightbulb Principle” 1.1.12. The “Newspaper Principle” 1.2. Tunnel Coverage 1.2.1. Wave Propagation in Tunnels · Ideal antenna position: centre of cross-section · Distance to walls: min. 2 l · Tunnel cross-section shape unimportant, if > 10 l · Time dispersion decreases with distance ==> constant · Tunnel bends and curves negligible ( >> l ) · Mount antenna ~50..100m before tunnel entrance · Good signal coupling between successive tunnels · Tunnels are very friendly environment for radio wave propagation 1.2.2. Tunnel Cross-sections · Radio wave propagation possible if cross-section > ~ 7 l · “Filling factor” determines propagation conditions · Typical ranges for filling factors high speed trains (Germany) ICE: 13% (aerodynamics) road tunnels: 10% (exhaust fumes, ventilation...) underground: 60..90%
展开阅读全文

开通  VIP会员、SVIP会员  优惠大
下载10份以上建议开通VIP会员
下载20份以上建议开通SVIP会员


开通VIP      成为共赢上传

当前位置:首页 > 百科休闲 > 其他

移动网页_全站_页脚广告1

关于我们      便捷服务       自信AI       AI导航        抽奖活动

©2010-2026 宁波自信网络信息技术有限公司  版权所有

客服电话:0574-28810668  投诉电话:18658249818

gongan.png浙公网安备33021202000488号   

icp.png浙ICP备2021020529号-1  |  浙B2-20240490  

关注我们 :微信公众号    抖音    微博    LOFTER 

客服